My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE105632
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE105632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:58:32 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 12:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982147
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/5/1982
Doc Name
NYHOLT PIT FN 82-147
From
MOBILE PREMIX CONCRETE INC
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Jay Lucas <br />August 4, 1982 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />2. Not having a straight shoreline is our <br />shaped shorelines". We will, as best <br />that fluctuate approximately 10 to 20 <br /> <br />A;,' G ;; 1982 <br />~nirvEU ~~n;D ri~ci_ar~arioN <br />Colo. Den(. or A'atural Resocrce~ <br />understanding of "irregular <br />as possible, have shorelines <br />feet. <br />3.e Preliminary drilling of the property indicated water at a depth <br />`"~of five to six feet. It is expected that this will be the final <br />a_ elevation of the lake. The 25-foot difference along the property <br />~,~~` line in the mining and reclamation plan is to accommodate <br />sloping of the banks. It is slightly in excess of what is actually <br />needed to meet the slope requirements. However, it has been our <br />experience that if only one or two additional feet of vertical <br />displacement extends five feet above water we go ahead and grade <br />them to at least a 3 to 1 slope. This excess represents a <br />margin to accommodate this possibility. <br />4. Mobile Premix has in the past worked with the County in regard <br />to our mining and reclamation. We do not foresee any change <br />in the cooperation that has existed. <br />Exhibit G - Water Re:~ources <br />l.ti Evidently someon~=_ by the name of Bratner left their name on this <br />,b Z area. The Bratnc=r ditch is not on the property or within <br />~~ r` hundreds of feet of the property. Bratner gulch is on the <br />r\ ~ property, however:, and should not be confused with the Bratner <br />H `- ditch. <br />2. The effect of runoff water on surrounding lands will not be a <br />problem. Drainage entering the property from the west via the <br />Bratner gulch wi:Ll be allowed to flow in the historic channel of <br />the Bratner gulch. Drainage entering property from the south <br />via a culvert unc9er Henderson Road will be allowed to drain <br />into the lake. <br />3. We have checked with the State Division of Water Resources on <br />wells within 200 feet of the mining operation. There are no <br />wells outside thc~ mining area within 200 feet. There is, however, <br />an additional well within the affected lands that has not been <br />used in about onc: year. This well (05197F) was used to irrigate <br />truck farming crops on the Mann Lake tract. There is now no <br />farming on this t=ract due to mining and the well will be removed <br />as mining progresses on the Nyholt tract. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.