Laserfiche WebLink
Elk <br />dominant. By 8:00 p.m, the drainage flow pattern is once again well established. <br />The wind patterns of Site 3 significantly differ from those at Sites 1 and 2. Drainage flow at Site 3 <br />comes out of the south. In fact, there exists a small component of the wind out of the south- <br />southwest which opposes the major drainage flow at the lower levels. This indicates that Site 3 is <br />abo~°e the major drainage flow at the louver levels and is simply measuring the light drainage from <br />the higher terrain above it directly to the south. Periods of upslope flow also indicate that the terrain <br />to the south of Site 3 dominate the winds at that site. Upslope flows are from the north, with few <br />exceptions. <br />Temperature <br />The average diurnal variations in air temperature over the spring quartet at Sites 1 and 3 are <br />presented in Figure 13. Data from the summer quarter are presented in Figure 14. The primary <br />point of interest in both figures is the timin of the early morning temperature increase. During the <br />spring, the temperahue begins its daytime climb an horn earlier at Site 3 than at Site I. The air <br />temperature during the summer quarter at Site 3 begins its climb an hour earlier than at Site 2, <br />a~rich precedes the climb at Site 1 by an hour. <br />This indicates that the cold drainage flows diminish in intensity and vanish at the upper sites fast <br />The vertical milting and insulting upper-level Sow coupling, ccfiich brings the relatively ccarmer <br />upper-level air down to the surface, begins v~~th Site 3 and proceeds then to the level at Site 2, and <br />finally reaches Site 1 deep within the canyon about to©or three hours after sunrise. This is easily <br />understood by realizing that the canyon and mountain sides are heated faster than the canyon floor <br />when the sun is low, as during the early morning. <br />Relative Humidify and Precipilatipn <br />The relative humidity at Site 2 averaged 58 percent during the summer quarter. Too little data exist <br />for the spring quarter to make a meaningfid comparison Although this value seems high, it should <br />be remembered that the site lies within a deep mountain canyon sitting at the base of a large <br />mountain range. <br />The average relative humidity during the summer ranged from a 30 percent to 88 percent The <br />highest humidity occurred during extremely cold drainage flows. The lower average relative <br />humidities occurred during unstable upslope flows. Overall, relative humidity ranged from five <br />percent to 100 percent <br />The total accumulated precipitation at Site 2 for the summer period was 1.60 inches. Because of the <br />low data recovery at Site 2 during the spring, the reported accumulation of 0.17 inches is not <br />believed to be representative of the springtime precipitation <br />Air tint' <br />• Limited sampling at the West Elk site has indicated relatively low concentrations of total suspended <br />particulate matter even with the aridity of the region The particulate data collected over the <br />2.04-122 IAA 7805; &94 7x271; 6/95 PR06;.Lfmch 2006 PRIO <br />