Laserfiche WebLink
. surface-based inversion is destroyed by solar heating, more vertical mining of the air which is then <br />associated with light and variable winds is able to occur and the surface air joins with the faster, <br />more freely moving gradient flow at higher elevations. This effect occurs at all three sites, with the <br />winds at Site 3 coupling about an hour sooner than those at Sites 1 and 2. <br />Another contributor to the rise in wind speed during this period is upslope flow conditions arising <br />primarily from convection due to the more intense heating of the canyon or mountain sides and tops <br />than heating of the valley or canyon bottoms. This convcetion upslope flow is generally in the <br />direction of the gradient flow and is further reinforced by the mechanism described previously. <br />As the sun drops later in the day, the vertical mincing begins to diminish. This results in less vertical <br />transfer of horizontal momentum from the upper level gradient flow to the surface layer and hence <br />the wind speeds diminish at all three sites. As the sun sets, the nocturnal surface-based inversion <br />begins to form. Once again, this results in the beginning of a drainage flow situation. As these <br />drainage flows funneling through the canyon again begin to dominate at Sites 1 and 2, the average <br />wind speed increases to its nighttime maxim~y Being above the intense drainage layer, Site 3 <br />experiences light drainage winds from higher terrain directly to the south which mma;n about 4 and <br />5 mph throughout the night <br />Wind Sneed and Direction <br />Because of the extreme topographical influence on the wind flows over the area, joint &equencY <br />• distribution data between wind speed and direction, or wind roses, were developed for different <br />segments of the day at each site. Complete data listings of all of these frequency distributions are <br />compiled and are graphically presented in Exhibit 24. Each wind rose shows the percentage of time <br />over the mporting period that the w=ind blew from a particular direction by plotting a bat in the <br />compass direction from which the wind blew, with a length proportional to that percentage of <br />occtr<rence. <br />At Sites 1 and 2 between midnight and 8:00 am., the drainage flow through the canyon is well <br />established and virtually all winds during this period come out of the southeast. Although the major <br />valley axis at this point tuns from east-southeast to w*est-northwest, there is a bend in the canyon <br />about 3,000 feet to the east which forces the flow to curve around and flow from the southeast In <br />addition, the minor tributary of Sylvester Gulch empties into the major valley immediately <br />upstream from the monitoring site. Drainage from Sylvester Gulch flows due north, and as it <br />merges with the drainage through Ute major valley itself, lends asouth-southeasterly component to <br />the flow. <br />Between 8:00 a.ID. and 4:00 p.m., three wind regimes are present Illiting the earlier part of this <br />period, drainage flows continue. Because the minor drainage component from Sylvester Gulch, <br />which most likely ceases almost immediately after sunrise, is not present, the flow exhibits more of <br />an east-southeast behavior. The light drainage through the main valley ceases about 10:00 am. <br />After a short transition period, upslope flows begin to dominate. <br />. These upslope flows continue until about 4:00 p.m The period from 4:00 p.m to 8:00 p.m. is <br />another period of transition During this time, upslope flows decrease and downslope flows become <br />20¢/2/ /N4TR05; %/Y47R7/; 695PR06,.1/mrJ~2006PR/0 <br />