Laserfiche WebLink
The flaws during the previous permit term, were much higher than <br /> the .016 cfs recorded by Fisher, Harden & Fisher on 5-12-B2. <br /> That flow occurred prior to the mid-late summer period. <br />By comparison, the peak flow during the first term was far less <br />than the 503 cfs expected for a 100-year, 24-hour storm event. <br />Again, the landowner's stock ponds resulted in reduced flows in <br />comparison to expected peak flaws. <br />Water Quality <br />A review of field and laboratory quality data for the first <br />permit term shows iron, aluminum and occasional trace metal <br />concentrations that are higher than those generally recommended <br />• for agricultural or domestic use and higher than those shown in <br />the Fisher, Harden & Fisher baseline data. However, these, <br />concentrations, per MLRD correspondence dated B-7-86 are normal <br />for the area and are not indicative of mining influences. <br />It is worth noting that the FHF data were based on a single, low <br />flaw event. Consequently, the five years of data collected are <br />believed to be more representative of the water quality of the <br />site. <br />The levels of pH, conductivity, TSS, TDS etc. showed only minor <br />variability during the first permit term. <br />r~ <br />~J <br />171 <br />