PERMFILE104617 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'~ Boar'.: _ rC1US'.Tect Rt'O_Glat:rn Cast '!c. !4R,-1 Page 2 LvNE.°.E.~~, tie Bcarr_: c: ',c].i:;tm~nt t,c~: Einal testimony or. the 13th day of Jul,•, 1933, ar.d continued the matter to the 17th day of Aunuss, 1923, at 9:00 a.m. for decision only with no further testi~or.v __ he received; and WHERE..=,5, based on the testimony and exhibits, the Board of Adjustment makes the Ec1lowLnc findings of fact: '_. Tt; ub~ _ _ ~r__ ss or~cc _ _ _ _ _ riy postea for the reGuir~d iitt"_'n ;L5/ ea_'s _:'mtciatei.i creced~ng the June 15, 1923, F CGL i i,. 2. The pL:~L1C I~earir.;, .:as extensive ar,d complets with all cer- t,:;er.t facts, rt~att-ors and issues being discus__=ed ar.d all in[.>rest= _ __zes ,sere heard at [he hearinc,. 3. Thy Eeard c: d;u=_t°ent specifically; incorporates all of the testimony and exhibits of tL•e hearings under Board of :. C.]USCT~2nC Cas_ :•;o, t•:. 3-i and further incorporates all of the fir.din:,s :~hich do ^ot conflict with the within Resolution ant. whit` are sat _crt., in the Resolutions for Case No. M73-1 adoptac or. 3un2 21, 1976, and amended on April 21, 1962. 4. The a:clic:.ticn conce-ns 20 acres and the operation will be carried out over the lift of the mine. :. Deer Creek Mesa Protective Association, Inc. filed a st_te- ;;:cr:t wit.. _. .z .. .. .,_ -•;~~...~....._ w ... ~..~, ri0) s, soffit reyuesia to ue included in the scecial exception for tem- Forarl use of the land. 6. The applicant res_~cndeo to each of the ten (10) points raised by the Ceer L'reek i~fes Protective Association, Inc. The applicant, h:estern Paviny Construction Company, stated 'ghat it voluntarily conducted periodic inspections of Deer Creek Canyon Road and reoaired and replaced potholes and broken pavement at no cost to the County. Western Paving Construction Company also indicated that there was some prior discussions with Jefferson County concerning the possibility of sharing the responsibility to repave the read but that no final action had been taken or determination made. 7. Western Paving Construction Company made a specific request to increase the established hours of operation relating to truck traffic and quarry operations, and this was opposed by Deer Creek Mesa Protective Associatiwn, Inc. and other citi- zens. The Board of Adjustment heard testimony on this issue from the applicants, expert witnesses, County staff and many citizens. The Board of Adjustment also considered the rele- vant findings by the Board of County Commissioners under Case No. Z79-34 and 282-58, which were applications for rezoning by Cooley Gravel Company for mining operations which would impact Deer Creek Canyon Road. 6. That the applicant has not established justification to increase truck traffic by increasing the number of tzuck hauls or permitting Saturday hauling. That Deer Creek Canyon Road is a narrow, winding canyon road used for access by many homeowners, employees and visitors including bicyclists, joggers and weekend tourists.