Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />t>~>~Y <br />Oepa~ucent d Naoeral Reeoueoes <br />1x77 sheeenan 5t, Room 215 <br />DaeneG Colorado 80203 <br />Plenee: (703) 866.3567 <br />FAX:13031832-0106 <br />EO <br />DO <br />OP <br />lLS <br />GY <br />DATE: November 21, 2005 sn °w" <br />roMSeeor <br />TO: Tom Schreiner o7~am, <br />awld w. raeea~y <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson ~'b" D1neor <br />Nannai IOewwc. reue/ee <br />RE: Review ojBlast Vibration Analysis Repoli Prepared Z1' Leonard Rice Engineers, Ina, <br />Clear Creek DiaMct Water Providers, LLC, MMRR Quarry, File Na M-2004-067 <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology engineering staff (DMG) have reviewed the November 10, 2005 <br />report, prepared by Leonard Rice Engineers, titled "Blast Vibration Analysis of Proposed MMRR Quarry <br />on the Black Hawk/Central City Wastewater Treatrnent Plant and Silver Dollar Metropolitan District <br />Facilities," (Rice Report). Phis includes the review of the final version of Appendix B to the above <br />captioned report received at ttte DMG on November 16, 2005. The Rice Report describes two concerns <br />with the blasting plan included in the MMRR Quarry application relative to the nearby valuable <br />structures: . <br />1. That receptors resident in nearby structures are susceptible to damage from vibration levels lower <br />than those commonly acceptable in the extensive preponderance of blasting vibration literature <br />and experience. <br />2. That the vibration levels at nearby struetures will exceed commonly acceptable Levels, as <br />described in the blasting literature, atnearby so-called sensitive receptors. <br />The MMRR Quarry Applicant has committed to blasting during development and operation of the quarry <br />in accordance with the well--known "Blasting Level Chary' compliance option. The Applicant has further <br />committed to detonation of initial blasts in accordance with the highly conservative "Scaled Distance <br />Equation." (Results of vibration measurements taken during initial blasting will establish criteria for <br />subsequent blasting to be conducted in aceordance with the Blasting bevel Chart). WiW these <br />commitments in place, there is no possibility, absent anon-compliant action, that vibration levels at <br />nearby receptors will exceed commonly acceptable levels. Therefore, the DMG analysis need only <br />consider the Rice Report's contention that nearby receptors are susceptible to damage by vibration levels <br />below those that are commonly acceptable. As background, these so-called "commonly aceeptable" <br />blasting vibration levels have been codified in regulations adopted by the United States Office of Surface <br />Mining, the Colorado Department of Labor, as well as countless other agencies worldwide. The DMG <br />Minerals Program has not adopted dogmatic adherence to "commonly acceptable" blasting vibration <br />levels because modem blasting practices and blast monitoring methods frequently allow vibrations levels <br />well above those that are "commonly acceptable" while still assuring that nearby sensitive structures will <br />not be damaged. <br />The Rice Report describes receptors in the Black Hawk/Central City Wastewater Treatment Plant and <br />Silver Dollar Metropolitan District Faciliuea that the report states may be damaged by blasting vibration <br />levels below those proposed by the Applicant, which levels have been found acceptable by the DMG. <br />osl~d <br />Mlrred land Reedamation <br />oslae d <br />Mive and Iepc7We Mines <br />calorado <br />CeoloBtea{ Survey <br />