Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />-69- • <br />again but it may be an eyesore, in other words an unreclaimed <br />operation from '74 or something like that. In which case if we <br />could get a reclamation plan in, in the next 90 days to take care <br />of that, that would resolve that issue as far as I'm concerned. <br />Ward: That's not what we're after. It seems to me, aren't we after <br />a kind of agreement that they would initiate that they'll take <br />care of these lands which were used in the past and there's no <br />obligation on their part to incorporate in their system so <br />to speak. I think we're probably not asking to we're not wanting <br />to force them to do that, I think we're talking <br />about things that they have operated and will continue to <br />operate and then you hope, as many operators have done, that <br />they will include some of the past operations that do need <br />some reclamation. <br />Mark, you're responding to Jan, I thought that .... <br />Brown: Okay, if that's the interpretation, then I think that's a <br />reasonable amendment, but to require them to reclaim orphaned <br />lands which were illegally orphaned, you know, when they just <br />weren't caught, that's where I would draw the line. <br />Ward: I'm not sure we have any authority to require that they <br />reclaim orphaned lands. Isn't that outside of our authority? <br />Brown: I don't know. <br />