My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE104313
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE104313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:35 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:02:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976027
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/18/1976
Section_Exhibit Name
TRANSCRIPT OF NOVEMBER 18 1976 MEETING OF COLORADO MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />November 18, 197G <br />D. Ward: Okay, as I understand it there is one, one permit ,application <br />that has been brought before the Board for consideration, so <br />I would entertain that, Gib, if you want to. <br />Rindahl: This is a pit down in Durango area to mine sand and gravel, mine <br />rg avel for the purpose of expanding and repairing the airport <br />in Durango area. They've asked for a 10 day, a 111, 10-day <br />permit; this is a different situation from what the legislature, <br />I believe, intended to give the 111 section. However, I think <br />from a logical standpoint and construction standpoint probably <br />would qualify as a 111. Construction does not start til next <br />spring; however, they need to stockpile materials in order to <br />start when the weather breaks in the springtime. Rade Orell is <br />the inspector for the area and will present the case. Probably <br />the first question would be does it actually qualify as a 111 <br />permit application. I think Lynn had some input, where'd she go? <br />Rade, did Lynn get the answers to the questions she had? <br />Orell: Not all of them. The specific terms of the contract that would <br />state what day they have to start by have not been submitted and <br />I talked to John Hoyt of Isabell Associates who is representing <br />or working on the contract for the FAA and he said that they will <br />not issue an order to proceed until they determine when the <br />runway can be shutdown next spring. He also said that if Nielson's <br />does not start processing the gravel soon that for every day they <br />go over the amount of time that the airport's going to be shut <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.