My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE103876
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE103876
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:17 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:33:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 10 VEGETATION INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />serviceberry seed was tested with the tetrazolium test on <br />February 10, 1977 and was round to be 87 percent viable. It will <br />be of interest to see if there is any germination in 1977 of the <br />spring 1976 planted serviceberry. <br />Grasses <br />Seedling numbers per 20-foot row for many of these grass species <br />' are high (Table 2). Numbers 61 and 60, Bromus marginatus and Elymus <br />glaucus, respectively, were from seed that vas collected on the <br />Colowyo properly and one might expect species that are found growing <br />on the property natively would do well on the revegetation test plot, <br />both from the standpoint of vigor (Appendix Table 3) and number of <br />seedlings. Bromus marginatus also produced a large amount of viable <br />seed and the ability of a plant to seed itself and disperse is very- <br />- -important for a species used in reclamation work. In future years, <br />the measurement of dispersion with the use of cover values will be <br />investigated for the individual species seedings. <br />Several of the wheatgrasses, basin wildrye, Russin wildrye, the <br />two grass species mentioned above and others did well enough to be <br />considered for reclamation work on the Colowyo mine. Sudan grass <br />also did very well in the seedings; Sudan grass was seeded in the <br />individual species seedings with the idea that it could be used as <br />a nurse crop. <br />• Arizona fescue (21) did very poorly in the 1976 results (Table 2). <br />We suspect that the seed may have been bad in this case; thus, we <br />reseeded the 1975 seedings of Arizona fescue on September 20, 1976 <br />with Arizona fescue (78). <br />Again, some interesting comparisons can be made between spring <br />and Fall seeding. Both western wheatgrass "Arriba" and Bromus <br />marginatus were seeded in the fall of 1975 and the spring of 1976; <br />the fall seeding did far better than the spring seeding. <br />Forbs <br />Several of the forb species did well and others did very poorly. <br />In some cases, such as Astragalus (55) or Aster (30), we suspect <br />that the seed was not viable rather than the plant being unable to <br />survive on the Colowyo site. Arrowleaf balsamroot has a high seedling <br />number for 1976 but late in the fall many of the seedlings appeared to <br />be succumbing to moisture stress. <br />The four penstemon species did very well in the individual species <br />seedings and there are legumes such as alfalfa, yellow sweet clover, <br />crownvetch, and lupine (Table 3) that did well. High numbers of seed- <br />lings are recorded for Utah sweetvetch; this is encouraging because <br />Utah sweetvetch is a legume that is found natively on the Colowyo <br />property. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.