My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE103421
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE103421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:59 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:03:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/20/1998
Doc Name
RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OVER OBJECTIONS REGULAR 112 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PERMIT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Page 8 <br />7. "The proposed project should not be approved until the applicant has obtained a plan for augmentation <br />or an approved substitute water supply plan to replace depletions caused by the pumping of ground <br />water from a well." <br />(Clean Water Action, Env. Info. Services, Trout Unlimited) <br />Response - (See Response for No. 4.) <br />8. "The operator will wash down dust from the gravel pit with 30,000 g.p.d. of water. Where is the water <br />to come frotn and who has the senior and junior rights to this water?" <br />(Clean Water Action, Env. Info. Services, Trout Unlimited) <br />Response -The applicant has purchased shares of Twin Lakes Water to use for dust control. <br />Application Exhibit H -Wildlife Information: <br />"Adverse affects of sedimentation and pollution on trout." <br />(B. Hamel, C.W.A.) <br />Response -The applicant's sediment control plans (see response to Exhibit G-Nos. 1, 3, and 6 above) <br />are adequate. Trout populations should be protected. The Division of Wildlife has reviewed this issue <br />and is of the opinion that there will be very little impact on fish. <br />2. "Severe impact on a significant wildlife habitat." <br />(C. D. Fislrer) <br />Response -The Colorado Division of Wildlife has reviewed the application and has not expressed any <br />concerns related to wildlife, except fish (See No. 1 above). <br />3. "The operation will have a negative impact on Bighorn sheep." <br />(Clean Water Action, Env. /nfo. Sen~ices, Tront Unlimited) <br />Response - (See Response for No. 2 above). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.