Laserfiche WebLink
Page 17 <br />"Safety hazard of being a collector highway (U.S. Highway 50); trucks on County Road 157 and the <br />highway." <br />"Changes the basic character and use of land at Parkdale." <br />"County Planning and Zoning Board, by approving the operation, failed to protect the utility and value <br />and future of the land at Pazkdale." <br />4. "Adverse impacts on air quality." <br />5. "The maps aze misleading in the designation of nearby buildings as ranch houses, when they are really <br />buildings associated with the D & RG and some historic significance." <br />6. "The location is incompatible to non-motorized traffic on the river and would cause yeaz-round serious <br />traffic congestion on the highway." <br />"The mining operation would cost Fremont County more to monitor various needs than it could ever <br />bring benefit." <br />8. "Aggregate mine's non-compliance with the Fremont County's master plan for preserving scenic <br />Highway 50 -Arkansas River Corridor." <br />9. "Possible affects of the proposed project on recreation and tourism industries are not addressed." <br />10. "The proposed project should give some consideration to the effects of the mine on visual resources." <br />11. "Blasting, crushing, screening and loading will create a severe noise problem affecting the experience <br />of area visitors". <br />12 "It is premature to place complete reliance on the transportation of the product almost entirely upon <br />a potentially unavailable rail service." <br />13. "The hours of operation." <br />14. "Washing down the dust from the gravel pit operation with 30,000 gallons per day of water is not a <br />good use of a limited resource." <br />15. "Objection to the location of the proposed mining operation." <br />l6. "Over 70 commercial outfitters are dependent on the Pazkdale site, trading a clean industry for a dirty <br />one which will only profit a few. We ought not to let this happen." <br />17. "Economic and quality of life concerns." <br />/SSUES THAT WERE RAISED AFTER THE INITIAL COMMENT PERIOD THAT THE <br />DIVISION BELIEVES ARE NOT WITHIN THE .IURISDICTION OF THE DIVISION OR <br />BOARD <br />