My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE102369
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE102369
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:17 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:45:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
RULE 2.05.4 RECLAMATION PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />METHODS <br />SAMPLING PURPOSE: <br />Several questions are of importance to coal mine operators with regard to the <br />reclaimed vegetation. In the fast couple of years after reclamation, the operator is <br />most concerned with determining whether a potential revegetation disaster has been <br />avoided. Do the reclaimed areas contain enough desirable species to allow them to <br />eventually meet the various vegetative success criteria? Additionally, are the species' <br />relative covers on track so that the reclaimed parcel may potentially meet the species <br />diversity/composition success requirements? For the Apex No. 2 Mine, success <br />• requirements involve technical standards, not a comparison to reference areas. These <br />standards are outlined at the top of Charts 2 and 3 in the appendrz. While these <br />immediate questions can be more precisely answered using 50 meter transecis and an <br />optical point frame, the longer term questions below are more adequately addressed <br />using small permanent plots. <br />Longer term, operators are concerned with the following questions. First, are <br />the desirable reclamation species increasing in absolute cover to approach or exceed the <br />success requirements? Second, are the reclaimed area species becoming more even in <br />their distribution in the communities, or is one species steadily becoming more <br />dominant'? Third, at a smaller scale, are new desirable individuals becoming <br />established or are existing individuals simply getting larger and not reproducing <br />themselves? Related to this third question are several variations. Desirable individuals <br />• could be declining in number, staying the same, or increasing. Additionally, desirable <br />reJ ~ /ro/ ~Sf <br />2 <br />~~`~-J S <br />L~~. ~ i i.,.,., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.