PERMFILE102109

• Permit No: C1984067
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 12/11/2001
• Section_Exhibit Name: 2.04.3 LAND USE INFORMATION
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

immediately shipped to Bookcliffs Commercial Laboratories in Steamboat
• Springs for analyses. The samples were collected by Alan Czarnowsky of
ACZ Inc. during the summer of 1984.
8. Pa a 2.04-15 classifies the overburden and interburdei
co ecte owever t ese c asst ications o not ag_ree
analyses in Table 2.
Overburden Sam le No. 1 was classified as a shale with sc
of car onaceous s a e, yet t e grain size ana ysl is in
indicated that 60% of this sample is sand. A shale b,~c
is a a im Hated sediment com osed r~ima~ri~ of c o
artic es. Over ur en Sam a No. w2 as c assifie as a s
yet the grain size ana ysis indicated almost equa amounts
silt and clay. The roof samp a was classified as a s
small amounts of interbe ded coa or carbonaceous sFi-ale
rain size ana ysis indicated that the grain size test cou
run large amounts of coa This should be correct
permit application.
RESPONSE:
Somehow,
• Interburd
reversed.
material;
"A" Coal
above the
e
s
t
s
n
the laboratory results shown on Table 2, Overburden and
'n Analyses for Samples 1 and 2, have been inadvertently
Sample 1 is a shale with some amount of carbonaceous
this sample extends approximately 12 to 18 inches above the
Seam. Sample 2 is definitely a sandstone which is located
shale of Sample 1.
A revised Table 2 is attached.
9. Section 4.05.8 of the permit
potential acid-forming or tc
is not correct, see comment
section should be revised i
comment.
RESPONSE:
lication states that there are no
ormin over ur en resent. is
under Section 2.04.6 above, t is
As mentioned earlier, Peerless Resources, Inc. and the Division have
agreed that there are no acid-forming or toxic-forming overburden or
• underburden material surrounding the "A" Coal Seam present. This
situation was clarified in the discussion under Section 2.04.6 response
found above.
e
-16-