My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE102076
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE102076
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:07 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:27:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Sections 6 through 12
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume VI Cultural Resources Documentation from 1997 to present
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I • Discussion <br />As expected. the survey yielded prehistoric open campsites. Although prehistoric <br />culturally diagnostic materials were scant, this study has provided an opportunity to expand <br />the present data base concerning the Middle and Late Prehistoric occupations ofthe West <br />Elk Mountains in particular, and the central mountains in general. Artifacts were found at <br />two of the prehistoric sites that aze suggestive of-but not clearly diagnostic of Middle and <br />Late Archaic period occupations. At SDT868, the base of a San Raphael Stemmed point was <br />recovered, and at SDT1283 the base of a large corner-notched type. The former is dated to <br />the Late Archaic, ca. 1500 BC to An 500. The large corner-notched type is not specifically <br />dated but is likely attributable to the Middle or Late Archaic periods. <br />The prehistoric sites were all found near springs (or small drainages that may have <br />contained such), which assure a good water source. They were also situated on benches to <br />reduce the threat of flooding. Two of the recorded sites had groundstone present suggesting <br />use ofthe uplands for floral procurement, although hand stones are often used in hide <br />processing. The apparent cache of manos near the pour-off in site SDT1285 also suggests a <br />seasonal return for gathering. The likely objects of the procurement were serviceberries and <br />chokecherries. <br />• The only historic site recorded was a corral and cowboy camp which indicates a <br />primary focus ofranching in the study area. Eazly land acquisition in the region appears to <br />have been by Cash Entry or Stock Grazing Desert Land Entry Patents. Many of the early <br />ones were relinquished, and these lands were later consolidated into larger ranches. <br />Management Recommendations <br />The eligibility determination and consultation process is guided by Section 106 of the <br />NHPA (36 CFR 60, 63, and 800). Inventory to identify, evaluate, and mitigate potential <br />effects to cultural resources affected by an undertaking is the first step in the Section 106 <br />process. Federal actions cannot be authorized until the Section 106 process is completed (36 <br />CFR 800.3). Final determinations of National Register eligibility and effect should be sought <br />from the controlling federal agency. The actual adverse effects due to subsidence can not be <br />determined as part of this study. Prehistoric sites SDT868, SDT1282, SDT1283, and <br />SDT1285 were field evaluated as need data and testing is recommended should there be <br />potential adverse effects from the proposed mining operations. <br />As directed by the new 36 CFR800 regulations, this inventory included the seazch for <br />relevant traditional cultural properties. Based on the files search, field survey, and this <br />researchers personal knowledge, no such communities exist within the project area. <br />• <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.