My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101568
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:48 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:03:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/4/2005
Doc Name
CSU/DMG Permanent Shrub Plots
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Appendix 13-11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• In summary, the following conclusions can be drawn from the shrub establishment demonstration <br />p1oLS to date: <br />The use of grass species with relatively low competitive ability, as used is the <br />demonstration plots, appears to have resulted in unusually good shrub <br />establishment. <br />Initial shrub establishment appears to be favored by fencing to exclude big game. <br />However, the long-term potential of shrubs that have established outside the fence is <br />unknown. <br />• Timing of seeding and post-seeding climatic rnnditions appear to greatly effect shrub <br />establishment in this region. However, seeds may remain viable for several years <br />during unfavorable conditions resulting in delayed establishment of seeded species. <br />• The use of shrub transplants may increase initial success, but the success of seeding <br />several shrub species such as sagebrush and bitterbrush at Colowyo mine relative to <br />Seneca mine illustrate the potential utility of this less-rnstly approach, The <br />establishment of tall shrub species such as serviceberry and chokecherry may <br />require the use of transplants and protection from browsing as evidenced by results <br />from the Seneca demonstration plots. <br />• Lesser amounts of topsoil (15 cm) appear to be better for initial shrub establishment <br />relative to deeper topsoil treatments (50 cm) although these observations vary by <br />site and may not persist in the long-term. <br />• Continued monitoring of the demonstration plots will be critical to make meaaingfnl <br />evaluations of these treatments since many effects may not become apparent for <br />severe! more years as plant communities progress from an early-sera! to mid- or <br />late-sera) conditions. Subsequent monitoring should be conducted every two or <br />• three years, and should include more intensive shrub measures such as the nse of <br />belt transects for counting shrub density. <br />Overall, it seems that successful shrub establishment is possible in these habitats so long as <br />important factors that reduce shrub establishment are considered in reclamation planning. These factors <br />include reducing competition from aggressive grass species, minimizing shrub damage by wildlife, and <br />reducing competition fmm weedy invasive or seeded grass species by using lesser depths of topsoil. <br />• <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.