My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101503
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:45 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:00:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1.4.1 Reoredina <br />Regrading would be the inRial reGamation activity conducted at a mine if the operator permanently <br />ceased operations. The areas requiring regrede al Trapper Mine, 'rf this improbable event occurted, <br />would be the open pRs and associated spoil piles, roadways, impoundments, and ash disposal area. <br />Regrede costs are summarized in Table 1.42 while the calculations of time required to complete <br />regrading activities are shown in Tables 1.4-3 to 1.4~. <br />1.4.1.1 PR Regradino <br />The regrading costs for Trapper Mining Inc.'s ash disposal area, alive pits, and the final cut where <br />Dertinger and Fltfleld pits come together, would require the largest e~endRure of money as can be seen <br />from the tabulated dollar values. The cross sections used to calculate the volumes shown in these tables <br />are inGuded in Append'a A. The spoil diagrems that are the basis of the regrede sections were <br />devebped using Mincom software and are a relativey accurate depiction of pit geometry before regrede. <br />The cross sedlonal areas were applied to incremental pit lengths for the worst case year of 2002 in the <br />ca~ulation of regrade volumes (or each pit. The number of cross sections constructed for each pk <br />depended upon the trial pit length and the variabil'rly of overburden and interburden depths to a linear <br />change in depth. <br />• Conceptualy, the backfilling of the open pits and elimination of highwalls would be accomplished by using <br />spoils from either one or two of the previous cuts plus the spoils from the curtest cut for a total of two or <br />three spoil rows. The number of spoil rows required would depend upon the pit. ft is important to note <br />that this regrede work would also resuM in the final coMOUring of all ungraded spoils rows for each pit <br />since mine regrede reGamation adivkies will always be within this spoil row limit (refer to Section 3.5). <br /> <br /> <br /> J~•J I~'~ ~~I~i'.V • _IJ <br /> -: -- dIDN i ~ ~9~a-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.