My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101395
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101395
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:41 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:52:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006049
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/11/2006
Doc Name
110c application Supplementary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS cmr
To
Kit Carson County
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />September 11, 2006 <br />Lynn Brownfield <br />Kit Carson County <br />P.O. Box 160 <br />Burlington, Colorado 80807 <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION O P <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />-bc- <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />Re; 110 Construction Materials Application for Kit Carson County's Klassen Pit, File M- <br />2006-047, Smith Pit File M-2006-049, and Beeson Pit M-2006-048; Supplementary <br />Adequacy Review <br />Dear, Ms. Brownfield, <br />The Division of Mining, Reclamation and Safety (Division) recently completed apre- <br />operation inspection at the Klassen Pit, File M-2006-047, Smith Pit File M-2006-049, <br />and Beeson Pit M-2006-048. As a result of some observations the Division developed <br />this supplementary adequacy review that lists some additional concerns that were not <br />included in the initial adequacy review. Please note that the decision date for this <br />application is September 15, 2006. All adequacy comments need to be addressed to the <br />prior to the decision date. <br />The primary issue, at all three proposed mine sites, is the presence and extent ofpre- <br />permitmining that has occurred. There was not any reference in the applications to the <br />presence of these un-permitted mines. No reclamation of these un-permited mine sites <br />appears to have occurred. The Division requests additional information on how this will <br />affect the mining and reclamation process. Please see the comments below. <br />6.3.2 Exhibit B- Site Description <br />1. Please provide a description of the extent of mining that has occurred to date on <br />the site, including is aerial extent in relation to the proposed mine boundaries, <br />availability of topsoil from the previously mined area, and the depth that mining <br />has occurred. <br />6.3.3 Exhibit C -Mining Plan <br />1. How does the un-permitted mining disturbance change the mining plan? For <br />example, the mining plan describes disturbing areas of no more then %i an acre at <br />a time, but more then %z an acre is already disturbed. Will additional stoLmwater <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.