Laserfiche WebLink
C~ <br />John Hick-nan <br />• <br />Rocky Mountain Rock Products -Deer Creek Canyon Quarry Drainage <br />February 14,1997 <br />Page 2 <br />5. Intercept Channel Location and Description. The intercept channel is planned to <br />divert gulch flows from the south side of the access road to the subject roadside ditch on <br />the north side of the road. The channel itself is planned to cross the road just above (west <br />of) the limit of asphalt pavement, neaz the scale house. The channel will basically act as <br />a driveable low water crossing, with rock armoring to prevent washout of the access road. <br />The routing is that the intercept channel will dischazge to the access road ditch by means <br />of a rock armored rundown/transition section as needed. <br />6. Sediment Ponds. The "upper pond" is to be a retrofit of an existing culvert intake <br />depression with an overflow spillway for use as a sediment pond. The "scale sediment <br />pond" is not existing, but is proposed as a new improvement to address stormwater runoff <br />water quality at the site. <br />The capacity of the ponds proposed is 0.67 acre-feet based upon water quality capture <br />volumes computed according to guidelines of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control <br />District (iJD). These guidelines aze based upon reseazch and analysis performed or <br />compiled by the District to efficiently address stormwater runoff water quality. The basis <br />of the approach is the "first flush" event of %:" rainfall, which covers more than 90% of <br />precipitation events in the Front Range of the metro Denver azea, and which is felt to be a <br />key threshold for suspension and transport of materials. <br />The Division is correct in its assertion that the indicated volumes are much smaller than <br />that required for full impoundment and slow release of 10-yeaz 24-hour storm event <br />runoff: It should be noted the "first flush" approach is based upon %z" rainfall, with <br />runoff volumes less than this amount dependent primarily upon impetvious azea per the <br />UD procedure. Our basins range from 2% impervious estimated for the upper basin to <br />5% for the middle basin and 20% for the lower basin due to quarry benches. Critical <br />water quality runoff depths from the UD charts were 0.02" for the upper basin, 0.05" for <br />the middle basin, and 0.12" for the lower basin. <br />7. Storm Water Management Plan. We understand a key factor in this quarry's condition <br />is that the quarry has been relatively dormant since 1989. We understand through this <br />seven year history that vegetation has substantially taken hold and greatly stabilized the <br />azea at a relatively low level of sediment loss. <br />Given this history, we aze hesitant to recommend extensive disturbance of inactive or <br />even undisturbed azeas for construction of erosion control improvement structures unless <br />the benefit is significant and demonstrable. We find this to be particulazly true in the case <br />of construction of cutoff and diversion ditches for undisturbed area runoff, particulazly in <br />a steep basin such as this where the construction disturbance for the ditches can be <br />substantial. <br />