PERMFILE100702

• Permit No: C1982054
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 5/23/1990
• Doc Name: DRAFT MINUTES MLRB
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Minutes, May 23-24, 1990 PAGE 13
Mr. Johnson suggested that this issue be dealt with as a continuation
of the application submitted in February; modify that application
through the technical revision process.
It was MOVED that the Board, there being no objection from the
operator, continue this matter to the June 1990 Board Meeting; hold a
Formal Public Hearing at the June Board Meeting and request that the
operator recommence publication and notice, recognizing that the
publication period should be terminated, but the public comment period
would not be expired by the June Board Meeting, but recognizing that
the Board could still make a decision at that Meeting contingent upon
not receiving additional public input which, as of that time, had not
been received and possibly allow some delegation to the Division at the
end of the public continent period. SECONDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
(Kraeger-Rovey, Cooley, O'Connor, Donald, Jouflas and Entz).
At this time, the Board gave the objectors present an opportunity to
state their objections. Ms. Kathy Brumitt, a resident of Alma, stated
objections regarding the berm, erosion, 404 violation, etc.. Mr. Mark
DeMarco, owner of property adjacent to this operator, stated that he
was not formally noticed regarding this operation. He said that he was
not in opposition to the operation, but wanted to be noticed in the
future. They answered questions from the Board.
Mr. Dennis Donald volunteered to serve as Pre-hearing Conference
Officer, regarding this matter, and the Board gave its approval.
Staff recommended that the operator be directed to submit a stability
analysis taking into account actual site material characteristics and
describing the current phreatic conditions within the berm embankment,
prior to being allowed to fill the pond. This analysis would be part
of the amendment application that needs to be perfected, prior to the
June Board Meeting.
Staff Presentation by Frank Johnson:
16. DISCUSSION ITEM
re issue ease and Desist Order.
Presentation to the Board of cease and desist forms to be issued to an
operator by the Division.
Staff presented ATTACHMENT C - the Division's proposed Cease and Desist
Order form and discusse a revisions that had been made in the form,
since it was initially sent to the Board for review.
Mr. Frank Johnson presented ATTACHMENT C1 - the service form (Return of
Service) for Cease and Desis r ers. a form would be completed by
the inspector at the time the Cease and Desist Order is served and
would assure the Division that the Cease and Desist Order had been
served.
It was MOVED that the Board approve the Division's Cease and Desist.
Forms. ~EC~NDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (Kraeger-Rovey, Cooley, Jouflas
and Entz).