Laserfiche WebLink
REVISION NO. 1. DURING THE MONITORING YEAR, AT LEAST ONE GRAB SAMPLE SHALL BE <br />COLLECTED WHEN STREAMFLOW IS PRESENT. THIS SAMPLE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR LAB <br />ANALYSIS FOR TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS, pH, TOTAL <br />DISSOLVED IRON AND MANGANESE. RESULTS OF THESE ANALYSES SHALL BE SUHMITTED TO <br />THE. DIVISION WITHIN 60 DAYS FOLLOWING THE END OF THE FIRST MONITORING YEAR <br />WHICH ENDS ON JUNE 30,1992. <br />Statue - On-coins. westione about compliance <br />The 1991 AHR indicates that there was no water in Second Alkali Creek on six <br />sampling dates in six quarters following the issuance of the Permit Revision. <br />It ie not clear whether flow actually never existed in the creek during those <br />quarters, or that there was no flow when EFCI did their quarterly monitoring. <br />Question 13 asks EFCI to elaborate on this issue. <br />STIPULATION NO. 16 <br />WITHIN 30 DAYS OF APPROVAL OF PERMIT REVISION NO. 1, THE APPLICANT SHALL <br />SUBMIT TO THE DIVISION THE FOLLOWING DEMONSTRATIONS FOR THE SMALL AREA <br />EXEMPTIONS WITHIN THE PERMIT AREA: 1)A DEMONSTRATION THAT SEDIMENT PONDS OF <br />TREATMENT FACILITIES ARE NOT NECESSARY FOR DRAINAGE FROM THE AREA TO MEET <br />EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, AND 2) A DEMONSTRATION THAT THE AREA ZS SMALL AND THAT <br />THERE IS NO MIXTURE OF SURFACE DRAINAGE WITH MINE WATER DISCHARGE. <br />Status - Terminated <br />EFCI submitted Technical Revision 10 on July 1, 1991. The revision was <br />approved September 6, 1991 and the stipulation was terminated. <br />STIPULATION NO. 17 <br />WITHIN 120 DAYS OF PERMIT REVISION APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT <br />DESIGNS FOR THE MAGPIE CREEK CHANNEL IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF <br />RULE 4.05.4. THE DESIGNS SHALL INCLUDE PLAN VIEWS, LONGITUDINAL PROFILE, <br />CROSS-SECTIONS AND CHANNEL PROTECTION DETAILS IN ORDER TO MEET THE <br />REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 4.05.4(4). <br />Status - Out of compliance <br />EFCI requested that the deadline for this stipulation be tied to the approval, <br />denial, or withdrawal of T.R. 9 in a letter dated August 22, 1991. The <br />Division concurred and requested that EFCI submit designs thirty days <br />following a decision on T.R. 9. T.R. 9 was officially withdrawn on October <br />16, 1992; the Division should have received a submittal November 16, 1992. <br />Adequacy question 14 requests a response to this stipulation. <br />STIPULATION NO. 18 <br />THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT TO THE DIVISION AN ANNUAL REPORT OF INFLOWS, <br />DISCHARGES AND CONSUMPTION OF WATER WITHIN THE MINE. THIS REPORT IS TO <br />INCLUDE A MINE WORKINGS MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF INFLOW; A <br />TABLE KEYED TO THE MINE MAP WHICH SHALL CONTAIN THE SOURCE (I.E. FAULT, <br />FRACTURES, ETC.), QUANTITY, DURATION AND QUALITY (I.E. pH, ELECTROCONDUCTIVITY <br />AND TEMPERATURE OF ALL INFLOWS; A TABLE CONTAINING RECORDS OF WATER DISCHARGED <br />FROM THE MINE, CONSUMED IN THE MINE AND IMPORTED FOR USE WITHIN THE MINE; AND <br />A DISCUSSION OF WATER BALANCE WITHIN THE MINE. THE INFLOW STUDY IS TO BE DONE <br />DURING THE SPRING OF EACH YEAR WITH THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY AUGUST 1. <br />11 <br />