My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55787
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:47:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/18/1998
Doc Name
COMMERCIAL MINE PLAN SUBMITTED TO BLM SECTION 8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Site. Limited habitat loss will be associated with the long-term use of approximately <br />• 6.5 acres for the Piceance Site processing facilities area plus approximately 14 acres <br />for the Piceance Site evaporation pond. These areas would only be reclaimed <br />sometime in the distant future at the end of the commercial mining phase. Larger <br />areas would be temporarily lost as mule deer wintering habitat in the development <br />of the commercial well field, but particular mining areas ("5-year mining panels," <br />see Section 2.1.1.2) would be lost as functioning habitat for a much shorter period of <br />time. As indicated in Section 2.1.1.2, the amount of land that could be disturbed <br />within each of the 5-year mining panels ranges from 125 acres to 209 acres and <br />averages about 172 acres (see Figure 2-1 and Table 2-1). Actual land disturbance <br />within each mining panel will be much less, but it will be significant. <br />Staged reclamation of the solution mining well field as each mining panel is retired <br />will minimize the size of mule deer wintering habitat loss within the well field at <br />any one time throughout the project life. As described in Section 6.2, it is likely that <br />reclamation of a particular mining panel will not commence until the end of that 5- <br />year mining interval. Usable forage is expected to be reestablished within 5 to 10 <br />years after initiation of revegetation efforts. Therefore, at any one time, mule deer <br />wintering habitat loss in the well field will roughly approximate the size of two to <br />three of the 5-year mining panels. For example, up to 160 acres of habitat would be <br />impacted in the first 5 years of solution mining (see Table 2-1). This area would <br />begin to be reclaimed during the following mining interval (years 5 through 10), and <br />• its return to functioning wintering habitat should have been at least partially <br />achieved by the 10- to 15-year mining interval. As discussed in Section 8.5, eventual <br />recolonization of reclaimed areas by native vegetation and natural successional <br />processes will be important in the long-term re-establishment of mule deer <br />wintering habitat at the Piceance Site. <br />It should be noted that much of the habitat within a mining panel will not be <br />subject to direct surface disturbance. Even when a mining panel is in full <br />development, it will provide some habitat and forage. Mule deer frequently have <br />high tolerance to structures and limited human activity . It is probable that mule <br />deer will make some use of the mining panels while they are in production. The <br />degree of use is difficult to estimate, but it would be a function of the degree of <br />human activity at any given time and the availability of forage and habitat in <br />surrounding areas. Because structures will be removed and activity will be reduced <br />at the end of mining, mule deer use is expected to increase in the mining panels <br />immediately after a panel is retired and reclamation is initiated. <br />The mining panels are relatively small areas on isolated ridgetops, and they would <br />be developed sequentially over time. In general, only one ridgetop at a time would <br />be potentially unavailable to migrating deer. Given the regional scale at which <br />migrations occur, development of the well field is unlikely to have any impacts on <br />major seasonal migratory patterns. <br />r~ <br />.~ <br />American Soda, L.L.P. 8_1(3 <br />Commercial Mine Plan <br />Aurusl 18, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.