My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55787
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:47:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/18/1998
Doc Name
COMMERCIAL MINE PLAN SUBMITTED TO BLM SECTION 8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />shrub communities, and 6 miles of pastureland/reclaimed vegetation. At a <br />• maximum pipeline corridor width of 75 feet, the corresponding vegetation <br />disturbance associated with construction of these 42 miles of pipeline beyond the <br />Piceance Site would total approximately 200 acres of sagebrush, 64 acres of pinyon- <br />juniper, 64 acres of mountain shrub, and 55 acres of pastureland/reclaimed <br />vegetation. <br />The regional abundance of the sagebrush and pinyon-juniper communities is <br />discussed above. Mountain shrub communities are locally abundant at elevations <br />over 7,000 feet. The loss of the acreages of these communities indicated above <br />would not be a significant impact on a regional scale. Reclamation and revegetation <br />of the pipeline corridor are addressed in Section 6.4 and Section 6.5.2, respectively. <br />The very narrow, linear pipeline corridor and the presence of abundant native seed <br />sources bordering its entire length enhance potential for long-term colonization and <br />succession of native plant communities. For maintenance and access reasons, trees <br />or large shrubs would not be allowed to become established directly over the <br />pipeline. <br />As indicated in Section 7.6.2, the pipeline corridor passes through a number of <br />geographical sections that have been documented to be the locations of plant <br />communities considered to be "vulnerable" or "imperiled" in the state and <br />throughout their ranges (see Figure 7-18). Potential impacts to these plant <br />• communities will be assessed in consultation with the BLM on asite-specific basis <br />based on final pipeline routing and specific known community site locations. <br />Potential impacts to threatened and endangered plant species are addressed in <br />Section 8.8.1. <br />As indicated in Section 7.6.3, the preferred Parachute Site occupies an existing, <br />inactive industrial site that is largely disturbed and whose vegetation is dominated <br />by weeds. Most new development will occur on previously disturbed sites, and, <br />therefore, no impacts to native vegetation are anticipated. <br />Less disturbed areas at the preferred Parachute Site are dominated by rabbitbrush. <br />Because most of the new development at the Parachute Site will be near existing <br />developed sites, the rabbitbrush community is not likely to be affected much. Any <br />impacts to this common valley-floor community would be insignificant. <br />8.6 WILDLIFE <br />8.6.1 Mule Deer <br />Estimated direct losses of mule deer wintering habitat at the Piceance Site under the <br />exploration plan and the experimental test mine plan were approximately 15.5 acres, <br />and these impacts have been accounted for in the respective plans (Steigers 1996, <br />• American Soda 1997d). Development of the commercial Yankee Gulch Project <br />would result in direct loss of additional mule deer wintering habitat at the Piceance <br />American Soda, L.L.P. ~'_18 <br />Commercial Mine Plan <br />August 18. 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.