Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section <br />Topic <br />Applicability at the <br />Hamilton Mine <br />Variances from <br />2.06.5(3)(c) approximate original Inapplicable, no <br />contour for steep slope such variances. <br />mining <br />Reclamation delay at Inapplicable, no <br />2.06.7(5) combined delay has been <br />surface/subsurface requested or <br />mines approved. <br />3.02.2(4) Adequacy of bond Applicable. <br />amount and terms <br />Midterm Review Methodolo2y <br />For this Midterm Review, the Division reviewed the following documents: <br />1. Permit application, including stipulations and responses; <br />2. Revisions made to the permit since the last permit renewal; <br />3. Annual reclamation and hydrology reports; <br />4. Bond surety and reclamation cost estimate; <br />5. Division findings documents and previous Midterm Reviews; <br />6. Division inspection reports; <br />7. Notices of violations since last permit renewal, if any. <br />PART II - SUMMARY OF: OPERATIONS, REVISIONS TO PERMIT, VIOLATIONS, <br />STIPULATIONS, VARIANCES, AND BOND <br />Oaerations <br />Table 2, below, summarizes the history of Permit C-91-078. <br />Hamilton Mine <br />Midterm Review <br />Page 3 <br />August 9, 2004 <br />