GENERAL55045 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Letter to Bob Oswald Date: June 25, 2001 Page 2 of 2 information, would it be possible [o obtain from your files copies of maps showing the permitted boundaries for the Monogram and Jo Dandy areas? I could then have these transferred to the topo bases and we would have a more useful set of maps. 2. Features on the maps which you and I shared during the Inspection do not always match the features on the topo base, and this is not too surprising considering that mining was probably conducted afrer the topo maps were created. Trails throughout the properties do not ahvays match the trails shown on the topo bases. Also the mine names shown on the topo base may or may not match the names on the original UMETCO permit application. Perhaps this can be resolved by transferring the original permit irfcrrnatior, onto thz topo bases I have. is this a reasonable way to attempt [o update the maps so your records and ours match? 3. Your Inspection Report for the Monogram - Jo Dandy area is shown as "Monogram Mines Permit No. M-1978-222-UG." I do not know the history of the combining of the various Permits that UMETCO held for these properties. The previous Inspection Report was presented as "Monogram - Jo Dandy Mines Permit No. M-77-293." Would you please clarify which Permit is in effect and which mines it covers so I can properly document this in our records? 4. From the limited information I have located in our files, it appears that the small outlined areas ("Affected Areas") on the November 20, 1995 map submitted by R.A. VanHorn of Energy Fuels may comprise the "permit area." Again, if you can confirm the permit area boundaries for me, I can update the drafr map I reviewed with you and we can have a useful map of the properties. 5. Regarding the need to post a sign for the Permit on the Monogram - Jo Dandy mines, since there are a number of small mines trader one Permit, I propose we only provide one sign. I would like your thoughts on where this sign would be most effectively placed. I think it would be most relevant if placed on the County Road that passes through the property area. Placing a sign a[ any one of the individual mines would put it in a location where no one would likely ever see it. Your thoughts please. As soon as possible, I would like to update the topo maps I shared with you on the inspection. This will give us both good quality updated maps. I can complete this is a short period afrer I receive the information I noted in items 1 and 2 above. I think if we can get a usable set of maps, then we can decide how to best proceed. I look forward to receiving your comments and information. My direct phone number is 303- 389-4161. Best regards, ~~ ~ Terry V. Wetz Director of Project Development