Laserfiche WebLink
a given site to be documented. Technical Note No. 346 is provided in Permit No. C-80-001 as <br />Appendix 4.3-B. <br />' The condition of the individual flow features previously mentioned were measured using <br />method 1 ("Cross-Section Survey") outlined in Permit No. C-80-001, Section 4.3. This method <br />' was chosen to determine the rate of degradation or agradation within these reaches over time. <br />The stability of the hillslope was measured using a modification of the individual feature <br />method. In this case, a reference stake was placed on each side of the suspected movement azea <br />with two stakes placed in the monitored area to form astraight-line transect. Any offset of the <br />' center stakes was then noted. Two transects were placed on the hillslope to determine if any <br />differential movement within the suspect hillslope occurred. <br />' MONITORING INFORMATION <br />MOFFAT AREA SUMMARY <br />Ten separate blocks aze designated in the Moffat Area. These azeas are shown on Exhibit <br />l ,Sheet 1 of 2, of this report. Table 1 provides a summary of the inventory data and is followed <br />by a brief description of each area and the corrective measures performed on each block as a <br />result of previous inventories. The numerical value for each block represents the composite <br />erosion condition soil surface factor (SSF) score as determined by the inventory methods. <br />' All of the blocks scored in the stable category during this survey. The relatively low <br />values were impart due to increased vegetative cover. Surface runoff from spring snowmelt <br />' resulted in minor soil movement in blocks 5, 6 and ]0. Corrective actions aze scheduled for <br />these areas during the summer of 2000. <br />Table 1: Moffat Area Erosion Inventory Data Summary <br /> Area 2000 1999 1998 1997 ]996 199 <br /> Blockl 6 6 12 18 17 22 <br /> Block 2 4 6 6 12 26 18 <br /> Block 3 6 9 12 18 21 23 <br />' Block 4 6 9 12 18 18 26 <br /> Block 5 18 6 6 9 21 32 <br />' Block 6 11 9 9 15 24 26 <br /> Block 7 9 9 9 24 20 43 <br /> Block 8 2 9 9 25 24 43 <br /> Block 9 6 6 6 24 30 37 <br /> Block ]0 12 9 9 36 <br />t Block 1 contains live-handled roto-cleared topsoil (1992) that did not receive additional seeding <br />as a test block for the reintroduction of native plant species on live-handled roto-cleared topsoil. <br />1 <br />' 2 <br />