GENERAL54783 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. David Shelton, Director February 24, 1981. Page Five provided by law. The defendant in this case was unable to prove that his denial of the requested autopsy reports was excepted from public disclosure in the Act .itself or in any other statute. This Colorado Supreme Court decision does not contradict our claim for confidentiality treatment under authority of §24-72-104(3)(a)(IV) of the Colorado Open Records Act, as provided for in 524-72-201 and 203(1) in the same Act. There are no known Colorado court decisions interpreting 534-32-112(9) of the 1976 Act or 534-33-111(1)(1) or (2) of the 1979 Act. In addition, there are no known Colorado Attorney General's published opinions on the cited sections of these Colorado laws. While not controlling, the Federal Freedom of Information Act found in 5 U.S.C. 5552 provides some analogy of similar purposes of public disclosure and treatment of confidential information claims based on trade secrets and commercial or financial information supplied to the federal government. Subsection (b)(4) of 5 U.S.C. 5552 specifically exempts from public disclosure "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential." The term "confidential" in the context of Freedom of Information Act exemption (b)(4) requires a subjective analysis of whether matters are customarily held in confidence by the owners and persons like him, and objective analysis of whether disclosure would (a) significantly harm the owner's competitive position and (b) deter others from submitting this detailed data to the agency in the future. See Federal Information Disclosure, James T. Reilly, Sheperd's Inc. §14.08. Historically, the term "confidential" was added to this federal Act to encompass non-trade secret concepts about matters which were held secret by persons and corporations and which were customarily confidential in the hands of those persons. The recognized objective test for "confidential" status is that established by National Parks & Conservation Assn. v. Morton, 498 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1974). The Appeals Court summarized the legal objective test for (b)(4) confidential status as follows: Commercial or financial matter is "confidential" for purposes of the exemption if disclosure of the informa- tion is likely to have either of the following effects: