My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL54560
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL54560
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:47 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:38:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/18/1992
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
underdrain has ranged from 1,600 to 3,100 umhos/cm. <br />The conductivity of the discharge from the south <br />underdrain has ranged from 3,300 to 5,300 umhos/cm. <br />The middle underdrain has never discharged <br />The disposal of mine waste exposes fresh surfaces of <br />saline shales and sandstone for leaching by water <br />infiltration from rainfall and snowmelt, thus <br />influencing the quality of subsurface flow. <br />The salt pickup rate depends heavily upon the local <br />hydrology. A study done by McWhorter and Rowe in 1976 <br />suggests that total salt pickup can be estimated from <br />saturated spoil analyses and a knowledge of the local <br />hydrology of mine waste disposal area. This model <br />would provide a method of evaluating the impacts of <br />mine waste disposal on water quality. <br />The permeability contrast found in the pile will cause <br />most of the leachate water to perch within the refuse <br />pile and above the native soils. A shallow water <br />mound will build within the pile and cause the water <br />to migrate laterally to small seepage areas at the <br />edge of the site. Water flows, during most of the <br />year, through the north and south underdrains. The <br />middle underdrain has never flowed. Some seeps have <br />been noted towards the base of the mine bench. <br />b. Surface Water Effects and Mitigation <br />The following discussion is oriented toward those impacts <br />which may affect Hubbard Creek. Effects upon the North <br />Fork of the Gunnison River will be similar, but of a much <br />smaller magnitude. Hubbard Creek runs through the permit <br />area between the mine bench and the former location of the <br />coal stockpile and is the only tributary of the North Fork <br />of the Gunnison which may be affected by operations at the <br />Blue Ribbon Mine. <br />Blue Ribbon Coal Company operated an adjudicated well <br />completed in the alluvium of Hubbard Creek adjacent to the <br />mine bench. Water from this well was used for sanitary and <br />industrial purposes. Water was produced at an average rate <br />of about eight gallons per minute. Blue Ribbon Coal <br />Company obtained conditional rights for the use of this <br />water and ditch and storage rights for the now reclaimed <br />Pond No. 1, which served as a source of augmentation water <br />to charge the well. The water rights for the Blue Ribbon <br />Mine have been abandoned. <br />The removal of eight gallons per minute (gpm) is a <br />negligible reduction in the average flow of Hubbard Creek. <br />For example, in 1980, removal of eight gpm equalled only <br />0.6 percent of the low flow of three cfs. Both the <br />-26- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.