Laserfiche WebLink
Bob Oswald <br />Re: PRELIMINARY Sunday Maps <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />align drainages from the hand-drawn topos with the drainages on the topo base from <br />the USGS Quad sheets. Obviously, slight rotation of the tunnel site claim boundary <br />greatly impacts the relation of the Affected Area boundary to the actual disturbed area. <br />I did not present the polygon shape that was submitted by IUSA to the Division in <br />1998, as there is no documentation or basis for that boundary. Cleazly we need to <br />determine how to address the Affected Area boundary issue for the West Sunday <br />Mine. Once we have established the Affected Area boundary, I can arrange to get this <br />boundary marked in the field. <br />7. TOPAZ MINE, PERMIT M-1980-055, 1" = 100'. <br />As noted for the Carnation and St. Jude Mines, the Affected Area corners shown on <br />the Topaz Mine map will be marked in the field, as requested by the Division. <br />8. GMG MINE, SUNDAY MINE PERMIT, M-1977-285, 1" = 100'. <br />Since the GMG Mine is now considered a "remote site" under the Sunday Mine <br />Permit, I have included a separate map of this site. As you have noted in your <br />correspondences, we will need to determine what aspects of the GMG mine site have <br />been "re-affected" and aze now therefore included as additional obligations under the <br />Sunday mine Permit. <br />The map that is provided shows the entire GMG Mine site. This map is not intended <br />to represent that Affected Area that has been impacted by operations following the <br />issuance of the Permit in 1977. <br />I wish to reiterate that the maps submitted herewith are Preliminary and are considered <br />"working maps" only. As we have established, there are number of open items that need to be <br />resolved so that IUSA can prepaze maps that completely and accurately depict site conditions <br />for each Permit. I hope proceeding in the current manner is more effective that having IUSA <br />submit maps that might require substantial revision and modification. The materials <br />submitted herein aze not a formal response to the Division Inspection Reports and follow-up <br />correspondences addressing current Permit problems. <br />As soon as we can finalize the maps, I will prepare a formal response, including the final <br />maps, that addresses all of the outstanding comments and problems noted in past Inspection <br />Reports and correspondences. I understand that IUSA also needs to provide final reclamation <br />maps for each of the Permits. This can only be addressed after I complete finalizing all of the <br />current status maps for each Permit. <br />