My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL54444
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL54444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:42 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981029
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/7/1988
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN1
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The expected ground water impacts for the Meadows No. 1 Mine are largely <br />negligible. Mining at the Meadows No. 1 Mine did not disrupt any local <br />aquifers. Little or no ground water of a regional nature has been detected at <br />the Meadows No. 1 Mine. The nearest regional aquifer is the overlying Trout <br />Creek Sandstone. No water was encountered in the coal seam or any of the <br />overburden strata which were disturbed during mining. The operation will not <br />affect any of the major regional bedrock aquifers, therefore the probability <br />of causing degradation of water quality in these aquifers (Trout Creek <br />Sandstone, Twentymile Sandstone) is small. The area which has been mined lies <br />stratigraphically below the Trout Creek Sandstone aquifer (see figure 3). The <br />dip of the underlying bedrock strata is toward the west. The nearest mine, <br />Seneca II, lies six miles to the south, southwest. Therefore contributions to <br />cumulative groundwater affects by Meadows No. 1 Mine are negligible as well. <br />A spoils aquifer could potentially develop in the area of the backfilled pit. <br />Prior to mining, the Pinnacle Coal seam received no groundwater recharge due <br />to an impervious shale above the seam. Breaking, removal, and mixing of the <br />shale during mining and reclamation processes have resulted in the shale layer <br />no longer restricting recharge of the coal seam. However standard percolation <br />tests demonstrated that infiltration and percolation rates through the <br />backfill are so low that recharge is not expected. Therefore the potential <br />for groundwater degradation is remote. <br />Surface Water <br />The Yampa River is the major perennial stream in the area. Its headwaters lie <br />in the mountainous areas to the north, east and south of the study area. Flow <br />in the Yampa River is dominated by snowmelt runoff with more than half the <br />annual flow occurring in April, May and June. The U.S. Geological Survey <br />maintains a gaging station on the Yampa River near Hayden, Colorado. Data on <br />the quantity of stream flow at this station are published annually in the U.S. <br />Geological Survey 's Water Resources Data for Colorado. <br />Three small ephemeral drainages collect water discharged from sediment ponds <br />in the backfilled pit area and from the haul road. Approximately 90 percent <br />of runoff from the pit flows into the Grassy Creek drainage. The remainder of <br />pit runoff and drainage from the haul road flow into Stone House Gulch and <br />Goal View Gulch. These three drainages empty into the Yampa River. The <br />loadout and office/shop facilities are located directly adjacent to the Yampa <br />River. Runoff from these areas is currently controlled by sediment ponds, <br />and gravel and berms. Applicable NPDES effluent limitations are in effect for <br />al l disc harges. <br />Expected surface water affects include increased evaporation losses from <br />sediment ponds, which are assumed to be offset by increased runoff from <br />impervious areas such as haulroads and structures, and increased total <br />dissolved solids and total salt loads in receiving streams. <br />The affect of surface water runoff from the Meadows No. 1 Mine on water <br />quality in the Yampa River is negligible due to the small quantity and good <br />quality, since no water is discharged unless it meets NPDES effluent <br />limitations. Therefore affected water quality in the Yampa River would <br />remain suitable for both flood irrigation and domestic use. <br />-B- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.