Laserfiche WebLink
:. iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii ::~ <br />Pip FL OpO <br />c <br /> <br />~ o <br />2 <br />~ <br />z y .. <br />S ~ L. Scott Tucker, E=ecutive Dnector <br /> <br />yb yy <br />een • i~~a <br /> -;1=~EIVED <br /> April 26.1999 APR 2 8 1999 <br /> ton of MineraPS ~ Ge0b9Y <br />i <br /> t <br />ws <br />Boartl of Directors <br />Executive Committee: $ Carl Mount <br />Cathy Reyrgltls 4 Colorado Departreat afNato.;.: Rc; ounces <br />Chairman <br />City of Derwar a <br />o Division ofMmerals and Geology <br />Margaret Carpenter ~ 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Chairman Pro-Tem ; Denver, CO 80203 <br />Gry of Thornton w <br />Debra Vickrey ° <br />Treasurer ' <br />m Sub'ect: CAMAS Colorado InC., COOI Reservou and <br />1 <br />Arapahoe County <br />Paul Danish ~ Fulton Wildlife Area Pit, File M-99-034 <br />Secretary <br />Bouitler County <br />u, <br />Gretchen Cerverry ; Dear Mr. Mount: <br />Member <br />City o1 Wheal Ridge ~ <br />i <br /> This letter is in response to your request for our review concerning the Notice of 112 <br />Members: 3 Construction Materials Reclamation Permit Application at the above-referenced mining <br />Pat Cronenberger <br />City of Littleton $ <br />z <br />site. We appreciate the opportunity to review this submittal 8S it relates to the South <br />Bill Himmelmann Platte River. <br />City of Derner 3 <br />B. H. Honmaster <br />Engineer ° <br />a <br />We have the following Concerns and comments: <br />Carolyn McIntosh ° <br />c~ly of Lafayette ~ 1. The a Leant has stated that no minis will occur within 400 feet of the South <br />PP ~ g <br />Fidel Montoya <br />ary at Danxar ~ Platte River channel without approval by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control <br />Linda Morton <br />Clt <br />of Lakewootl <br />~ District (District Thls is acceptable; however, the 100- to 400-foot setback <br />) <br />y <br />Debo2n Ortega „ limits are not properly shown on the plans. The setbacks have to be measured <br />City of Denver ~ from the top of existing bank, or from the top of master plan bank, whichever is <br />Jonn Paroske <br />city et Aurora <br />~ <br />farthest away from the river. The plan needs to be revised acwrdtngly before <br />Art Panes approval. I have enclosed a sketch of the 100- to 400-feet we feel is acceptable <br />Engineer <br />~ <br />now. This is especially important along the west bank of the river at the McKay <br />R¢hard Sheehan <br />Jefferson County a Road and 104th Avenue bridges. Preliminary plans call for new longer bridges. <br />James Sutfivan ~ Therefore, the mining and reclamation setbacks need to start from the master <br />Douglas County <br />Elaine Valente i <br />° <br />plan channel bank alignment (i.e., proposed west side bridge abutments), not the <br />Atlams County W 100-foot minimum setback SS shown on Exhibit C-2. <br /> 2. On Exhibit C-2, IvIuring Plan Map, the Phase lA and 1B areas show a note that <br /> reads "no mining within 35' of the top bank S. Platte River." The minimum <br /> setback allowed is 100 feet with both riverbank and pitside bank protection. A <br /> variance maybe allowed if the applicant can guarantee that they mine and <br /> immediately reclaim the area within the 100-foot setback during one low flow <br /> season (generally October through March). <br />plaol4yaotmmnrLL <br />