My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53802
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53802
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:57:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/22/1999
Doc Name
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 1 CHAPTER 4 PAGES 1 THRU 50
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CNAPTERFOUR <br />Responses to Public and Agiency Comments <br />Letter and <br />Comment No. Response <br />F-4.2 The nearest Class I and sensitive Class II azeas, along with their <br />approximate distance from the proposed project and identiification of the <br />Federal Land Manager, aze: <br />• Flat Tops Wildemess Area - Class I 65 km IJSFS <br />• Dinosaur National Monument - Class II 58 km IdPS <br />• Colorado National Monument -Class II 67 km IMPS <br />The Mazoon Bells Class I Wildemess Area is approximat<;ly 80 km from <br />the Pazachute Site. This has been coaected in the text. Tt~e analysis <br />presented in the Draft EIS, and the response to Commeat F-4.1 indicate <br />that the impact at the Flat Tops Wildemess Area is small, and it is expected <br />that impacts would be even less at the Mazoon Bells. The Mazoon Bells is <br />located an additional 15 km distant from the closest part of the project, in <br />the southeasterly direction, on the other side of several mountainous temdin <br />features, and is over 1001an from the Piceance Site. <br />F-4.3 As indicated in the response to Comment F-4.1, the analysis using <br />CALPUFF/CALMET has been completed using the Mt. [:irkel IMPROVE <br />monitoring data as decided during the November ] 0, 1999 meeting. <br />F~.4 The trona industry uses a process that oRen brings petroleum-bearing shale <br />deposits to the surface with the trona ore. In a response from the trona <br />industry, emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) occur during <br />the trona mining process. The trona process also can expose this <br />petroleum-bearing material to high heat in a calciminer. Studies by the <br />trona industry have indicated some VOC emisstons from these processing <br />operations. BLM lease stipulations would require that oil shale <br />hydrocarbons not be decomposed by the mining process and converted to <br />vapors and/or liquids. Based on recent analyses, the project has quantified <br />potential hydrocarbon (VOC) emissions from the wellheai gas separators, <br />the stripper system, and the combustion sources to be 38._~ tpy. This level <br />was calculated using conservative assumptions and the maximum <br />production rate of 1.4 million tpy. The CDPHE-Air Pollution Control <br />Division has proposed requiring quarterly monitoring of VOCs and <br />hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), such as benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene <br />and xylene or BTEX, from the process stream as part of their air pollutant <br />emissions operating permit. <br /> <br />• <br />Based on a review of the current (but insufficient) documentation and <br />research of potential visibility impacts in urban areas due to secondary <br />organic aerosols, such as the Los Angeles, California, bas~m studies of <br />Pandis, et al. (1992) and Grosjean (1984, 1985), rural western Colorado is <br />4-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.