Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTERFOUR. <br />Responses to Public and Ag~encY Comments <br />Letter and <br />Comment No. Response <br />atmospheric deposition of nitrogen, and the impact on visibility of <br />particulate nitrate at receptors located at Class I azeas in the project <br />vicinity. Since this CALMET/CALPUFF analysis was developed by the <br />NPS, the same wind fields and modeling procedures were used for the <br />Yankee Gulch Level 2 CALMET/CALPUFF analysis. <br />The USDA Forest Service requested that EIS modeling analyses be <br />performed for both Yankee Gulch sources alone (i.e., the ]?roposed Action <br />analysis) and for multiple sources in the region (i.e., cumulative impacts <br />analysis). The source emission for the Proposed Action a~ialysis included <br />all Yankee Gulch sources of NO, and PM,o at both the Piceance and <br />Parachute facilities. The cumulative sources modeled inclluded the <br />Glenwood Springs Resource Area "reasonably foreseeable" scenario, <br />which assumes that current NOx emissions from oil and gnu sources will <br />double with foreseeable growth. The estimated annual NOx emissions for <br />the "reasonably foreseeable" oil and gas development sources totaled 1,655 <br />tPY• <br /> <br />Ambient concentrations of atmospheric constituents were calculated by <br />CALPUFF at discrete receptor locations for specific Class; I and sensitive <br />Class II areas. The discrete receptors were placed on the closest boundary <br />locations to the Yankee Gulch facilities for each Class I o:r Class II azea. <br />Regional haze, caused by increased concentrations of primary particulate <br />emissions and secondazy aerosols, is characterized by decreases in visual <br />range and contrast of observed landscape features. For the purposes of <br />assessing regional visibility degradation due to specific sources of air <br />pollution, the primary focus is on the contribution to light extinction of <br />secondary sulfate and nitrate, and primary particulate matter, and how the <br />visibility is affected by changes to the extinction coefficient. Based on <br />modeled concentrations, anextinction coefficient can be <:omputed and its <br />effect on visibility assessed. <br />The deciview visibility index is designed to be lineaz with humanly <br />perceived changes under assumed commonly occurring conditions. <br />Deciview increases with increasing visibility impairment. The deciview is <br />a simple logarithmic transformation of the extinction coeflcient, and <br />therefore is easily determined from measured or modeled concentrations. <br />As a measure of potentially significant change in visibility, 1.0 deciview <br />(i.e., just noticeable change) has been proposed by Pitchford and Mahn <br />(1994) and was adopted by the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport <br />Commission. A 1.0 deciview change (equivalent to a 10 :percent change in <br />extinction coefficient) is a measure of a small but perceptible change under <br />many circumstances. In addition, the USFS has established a'/:just <br />4-14 <br />