Laserfiche WebLink
been terminated. Please provide any additional information OMI has regarding this <br />commitment. <br />Section IV. -Decision to Require Revisions or Additional Information <br />Requests for additional information were included in the adequacy letter for PR-4. The <br />Division would like to complete the review of this revision as soon as possible. No <br />further requests for information will be required as part of this midterm review. <br />Section V. -Bonding Summary <br />The bond was reevaluated in conjunction with Technical Revision No. 32 approved on <br />July 10, 2001. The required surety was $2,738,513.00. OMI submitted a bond in the <br />amount of $2,800,000.00. Additional bond was required for the revisions shown below. <br />Revision Additional $ <br />MR-54 $ 1,997.00 <br />MR-55 $ 21,580.00 <br />MR-56 $ 28,799.00 <br />MR-57 $ 21,317.00 <br />TR-38 $ 98,723.00 <br />The total required bond amount is now $2,910,929.00. OMI has submitted bonds to <br />cover this amount. <br />The Division will reevaluate the reclamation cost estimates afrer responses to PR-04 have <br />been submitted. There aze several questions in the adequacy letter that will affect the <br />reclamation cost estimate. Additionally, OMI should be awaze that several of the <br />Division's costs have increased recently. Updated costs aze being used for much of the <br />equipment including dozers, graders, scrapers, excavators and shovels. These updated <br />costs were not used in calculating the reclamation cost estimate for TR-32. These <br />updated equipment costs will increase the amount of bond required. <br />Sanborn Creek and Elk Creek Mines Midterm Review <br />Permit No. C-81-022 6 April 24, 2001 <br />