Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />R. H. PECK, P.G. <br />State of Colorado <br />Re: Permit No. C-81039 <br />January 13, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Be that as it may, no one quarrels with the notion that my client <br />shouldn't be paid twice for the same work and any reimbursement or <br />other credit should go back into the pot. <br />At this point, I have never seen the existing agreements nor is it <br />necessary that I see them, except that whatever is put together <br />concerning this weed control fund must be consistent with those <br />documents. <br />After you have had an opportunity to digest this letter, I would <br />appreciate your response and suggestions as to how we can now proceed <br />while we have time to give this matter our attention to the end that we <br />don't try to put together something at the last minute. <br />May I hear from you at gour earliest convenience concerning these <br />concerns and your thoughts as to how this matter can be appropriately <br />structured. <br />fa <br />cc - Mr. Dean R. Massey, Esq., Parcel, Mauro, Hultin S Spaanstra, P:C., <br />Suite 3600, 1801 California Street, Denver, CO 80202 <br />- Mr. Stephen G. Shapiro, Vice President/General Counsel, Trans- <br />continental Corporation, P.O. Box 458, Santa Barbara, CA 93102 <br />- Mr. Red Cortner, P.O. Box 861, Hayden, CO 81639 <br />GORHAM/L:CROSS/MT <br />