My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53151
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:38:47 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/4/1993
Doc Name
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED P 845 334 993
From
DEPT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r • <br />.~ <br />L <br />3 <br />Based on inforwation in our files, it appears the pit roe inactive far <br />epproxiwately nine years betreen late 1981 and early 1991. A cowpliance <br />examination conducted on Decewber 19, 1985, revealed that your conveyor <br />roe still on site but the pit roe inactive. (This roe personal property <br />rhich, in accordance rith Section 19 of the STANDARD PROVISIONS, should <br />have been removed frow the site by no later then February 2, 1983.) <br />On March 11, 1991, a small sale of wineral wateriale roe authorized frow <br />the pit to Sutherland Brow., Inc. far 1,000 cubic yards of Band and <br />gravel. Thies sale included the stockpile of gravel waterial, the <br />ornerehip to rhich had reverted to the United States nearly eight years <br />earlier. <br />During a discussion you had rith BaD Kerehar late last year (1992), you <br />indicated that you Wight pcesibly be interested in purchasing cone additional <br />waterial frow the subject pit. In response to that request, BLN spent several <br />days doing weaeurementa and calculations of possible reserves rhich could be <br />rewoved frow a defined area rhich could ultiwately result in elopes suitable <br />for final reclawation rithin the pit area. <br />Our calculations resulted in a figure of approximately 4,000 cubic yerde of <br />material rhich could be readily available and could facilitate uncowplicated <br />reclawation. <br />In addition, re have reconsidered our initial proposal to designste the <br />Disappointwent pit as a •cowwunity pit.' Historically, dewand for gravel <br />waterial crow the general public, counties or other contractors has been <br />winiwal over the peat ten years. Me also see nothing in the near suture rhich <br />could generate substantial dewande for any gravel resource. Therefore, re see <br />no need to waintain the pit in an unreclaiwed statue. Horever, I recognize <br />this situation has a long and eowerhat confusing history. After our talk, I <br />discussed it at length rith Bob Kerehar and Kent Hoff wan of wy staff. <br />Finally, chat woof guide BLM actions are our existing lace, regulations, and <br />contracts. <br />Therefore, re present tro options to you at this tiwe concerning the subject <br />pit. <br />1. If you desire, re could initiate a contract rith you for 4,000 <br />cubic yerde of waterial frow the specific areas of the pit defined <br />by the weasurenente taken last euwwer. Rewoval of the material <br />could be accowplished in a wanner rhich rodid be torard final <br />reclawatian of the pit. Once the 4,000 cubic yards are rewoved <br />frow the pit area or expiration of the contract, rhichever occurs <br />first, the pit area rill be fully reclaiwed to the standards set <br />forth in the original contract 1C0-030-MPO-1) and those required <br />in your perwit frow the Colorado Nined Land Reclawation Division <br />(N-80-038). The reclawation could include backfilling of any <br />exploration pits existing in an open condition that rare dug under <br />the authorization of October 12, 1979. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.