Laserfiche WebLink
All exceed the 16 <br />W ~ ~ foot by 80 feet or <br />- .--'"' equilivant area. <br />:~. <br />_ ^j~aj <br />~ '4/~TI/ <br />_~ti~ r ~~~ <br />Stipulation #2 -May 3, 1994 <br />'. <br />~~~ `i~~i <br />~•~ <br />'Topsoil and sandy overburden stockpile areas will be designated on the mining plan map. <br />Exhibit C, before any part o/Phase 2 and 3 are disturbed. Such designation must be in the <br />lormat of a revision fo the permit. " <br />Evidence for Stipulation 2 -July 12, 2004 <br />Note that Phases II and III were never started <br />Phase 2 (I) and 3 (III) were never disturbed. Stipulation 2 only requires a Map ii Phases 2 and 3 <br />were started Since Phases 2 and 3 were never started then ExhibR C may not exist and is not <br />required. <br />Please note that topsoil and sandy overburden areas are on the existing permitted area which <br />exceeds Stipulation 2. <br />Stipulation #3 -May 3. 1994 <br />'The specific amounts of growth medium necessary to complete reclamation of Phase 1 will be <br />submitted fo the Division no later Than May 31, 1994. This material will either be stockpiled on- <br />site until it is used for reGamafion activities to the operator can poll necessary bond for the <br />hauling sufficient material in Irom oH--site. Stockpiling growth medium or posting sufficient bond <br />must ocan on or before July 15, 1994.' <br />Evidence for Stipulation 3 -July 12, 2004 <br />I have not found the specHic correspondence. With the demolition of the Laporte. Colorado Plant <br />many files have been packed and shipped to Holcim, Inc. Corporate Office in Dundee. MI <br />Corcespondence requested in Stipulation 3 may be in those files and could be searched with <br />great effort. Paul Thomsen on July 12. 2004 said that rf the Division of Minerals and Geology had <br />requested the correspondence, it would have been written. Therefore we ask For a variance to <br />