My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL52039
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL52039
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:38:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_Zg- <br />• The Sagebrush community at the Munger Cannon site did not have a corresponding <br />representative at the ;4cClane Canyon site, :with which data could be compared. <br />It is therefore stipulated: <br />Stipulation No. 9 <br />THE PERYITT£E SHALL RESAMPLE THE f4UNGER CANYON BIG SAGEBRUSH <br />COMMUNITY FOR PRODUCTION DURING THE 1983 GRO!/ING SEASON. TffE <br />SAMPLING SHALL BE OF AN INTENSITY TO MEET SAMPLE ADEQUACY <br />REQUIREMENTS OF THE DIVISION. TXE RESULTS OF TXE SAMPLING <br />SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO TXE REGULATORY AUTHORITY ,YO LATER THAN <br />30 DAYS AFTER THE CDI9PLETION OF SAI9PLI,YC AND BEFORE SEPTE."4BER <br />30, 1983. <br />it was determined by the Division that the production data For the reverence <br />areas for the Munger Canyon vegetative communities did not meet sample adequacy <br />requirements. Due to the small area pF disturbance at the Munger Canyon site, <br />the Division has determined that pre-mine cover and productivity data may be <br />applied as revegetation success criteria provided the permittee can demonstrate <br />that pre-mine sampling provides data lrhic6 is representative of what may be <br />expected From the vegetative communities present.' It is therefore stipulated: <br />Stipulation No. !0 <br />TXE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT TO THE RECULATOP.Y AUTHORITY A <br />DEMONSTRATION OF TXE REPRESENTATIL'ENESS OF TXE VEGETATIVE <br />• SAMPLING FDR TXE VEGETATIVE COMMUNZTIEE AT THE i411NGER CANYON <br />SITE. THIS DE:f0N5TRATION SNALL ADDRESS RAINFALL AAfOUNT AND <br />SEASONALITY FOR THE YEAR OF VEGETATION SAMPLING AND T.YE T:/O <br />PREVIOUS YEARS AND COMPARE THIS INFORMATION TO 74EAN ?RE- <br />CIPITATION AMOUNTS AND SEASONALITY FOR THE LOCATION. THIS <br />DEid0NSTRATION SHALL dE SUBMITTED o0 DAs5 AFTER PER7IT ISSUANCE.. <br />Salt Creek ;fining Company has not demonstrated that adequate woody plant densitu <br />sampling has taken place at the Munger Cannon site. It is therefore stipulated: <br />Stipulation :VO. 11 <br />TXE PER7ITTEE SHALT SUPPLY TXE REGULATORY AUTY.ORITI'[/ZT.Y [/OODY <br />PLANT DENSIT'l DATA FOR ALL SAMPLED COMMUNITIES TO INCLUDE, 6UT <br />IJ01' BE LIMITED TO, SAMPLE $i ZE, SAMPLE 74EAN, SAMPLE VARIANCE, <br />AND LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE ACHIEVED. IF SAldPLI;IG ADEQUACY IS :VCT <br />MET, THE ?ERMITTEE WIL;., BE REQUIRED TO 3ESAMPLE AS ;fECESSARY <br />DUP.IPlG THE 1982 GRC"dING SEASON. THIS _*i:FOP14A T_*OP7 SXA Li BE <br />PROVIDED TO THE DIVISION WITH_*.'f 30 DAYS CF 2ER"TIT ISSUANCE. <br />3e•~egetation ?Ian (?.OS.4(2)(e1) and Revegetation Success !4.15) <br />The Di vi s: on :Vas re viewed t':e '^.unger Canycn _=•ieceCat:on p_'an and proposed <br />success c r to via !Section 3-5, Volume IJ. <br />The applicant gas cro cesed stoc.ki ne wcodu niant saecies in each or t^e afFected <br />conrru:ucles. ":e stpc.ki.Va _e:•e1s proposed r.rv :rom the ore-.miainc ;e.^.sit_ss. <br />• 7o jvs ti _` ca ti cn has been provided _`or `_ne Zewe red ^ers_t:es. I`_ a t ere Fore <br />Sts p~13Ced: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.