Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-26- <br />• The assessment of the probable cumulative impacts of all an ticioated coal <br />mining in the general area on the hydrologic balance, as described in 1.05.6(3), <br />has been made by the Division, and the operations proposed under the application <br />have been designed to prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the <br />proposed permit area. <br />The operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />X. Climatological Information and Air Resources - Rules 2.04.3, <br />2.05.4(2)(h), 2.05.6(1) and 4.17 <br />Sections 4.9 and 4.10 of Volume I of the application contain the pertinent <br />information for this section. Salt Creek mining Company has included the <br />required climatological infornation for Grand Junction. No site-specific <br />information is available. <br />Salt Creek Mininq Company has applied with the Colorado Department of Health <br />for an emissions permit to cover all aspects of the operation. The emissions <br />permit limits extraction for the operation to I00,000 tons per year. The <br />applicant projects production for the first year at 149,000 tons of coal. The <br />following stipulation is, therefore, required: <br />Stipulation .NO. 5 <br />THE APPLICANT SHALL NOT ,NINE ,YORE THAN 100,000 TONS OF COAL ANNUALLY <br />• UNTIL 'lt hd5~ 08TAINED A REVISED AIR QUALITY PERMIT FROM1f THE <br />COLORADO DEPARTd1ENT OF HEALTH FOR THE HIGHER PRODUCTION LEVEL. <br />[,tith the acceptance of this stipulation, the operation is in compliance with <br />the recuirements of this section. <br />XI. Soils - Rules 2.04.9, 2.05.3(5), 2.05.4(21 (d) and 4.06 <br />Information dealing with baseline topsoil characteristics and depths available <br />for reclamation are Located in Sections 2.4, 3.2, 3.4 and 4.7 of Volume _* of <br />the application. A few minor deficiencies and inconsistencies were identified <br />during the review of these materials. All concerns were adequately resolved by <br />the applicant and responses were incorporated into the application. <br />No topsoil was stripped prior to the disturbance which presently exists at the <br />nine. Construction of the road consisted primarily of widening an existing <br />farm road and cutting into a steep slidslope. _*his extension of the road, ss <br />well as developm°nt cf the existng face-up occurred in an area of t.`[in soils <br />along steep slooe5. A combination of these steep slopes and thin soils ,Wade <br />toosoi_' salvaoe difficult. <br />Soils :oete mapped at an order _* to II Ieve1 of intensity in t.:e area to be <br />disturbed and orc_'er III in ether pro:c.nate areas (see ?figure 4.7-1, volume _*I <br />of the epplicatienl.These soi_'s were c!assi " ed tc the series and subcrcup <br /> <br />