My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51193
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:36 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:36:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/9/2007
Doc Name
Landslide Review Memo
From
Byron Walker
To
Janet Binns
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Current impression on this Accelerated ground movement <br />topic and on the feasibility of was "most likely" influenced by <br />reaching a definitive conclusion precipitation. The connection is <br />regarding it is to be in the not clear. <br />Phase II re ort. <br />Item 1 3) include) The failure surface/zone within the strati rah of the landslide area. <br />Initial impression to be provided Initial assessment is provided. <br />in the Phase I report. Update to May be the 1.9-foot thick ML <br />be provided in the Phase II Roof (mudstone) at a depth of <br />re ort. 107.6 feet. <br />Item 1(3 (a) Determine how the failure surface/zone ma have contributed [o the landslide. <br />Initial impression to be provided Initial impressions were provided. <br />in the Phase I report. Update to Information is extensively <br />be provided in the Phase II qualified. <br />re ort. <br />Item 1(4) include) The structural eolo of the slide area. <br />Possible structural geology to be Some stmctural geology <br />provided in the Phase [report. information is provided. <br />Current impression to be (Addition information is already <br />rovided in the Phase II re ort. available in the PAP.) <br />Item 1(4)(a) Please determine how the structural eolo ma have contributed to the landslide. <br />To be provided in the Phase II Jointing was considered as not a <br />re ort. ma or factor. <br />Item 1(5) (include) The location and extent of the "scoria" outcrop near the southwest comer of the <br />landslide. <br />A map is to be provided by A map showing the location was <br />December 8, 2006. rovided. <br />Item 1 5 a Please determine whether this eolo is feature contributed to the landslide. <br />Current impression is that it did Bum areas might have arrested <br />not. An update to be provided slip blocks short of the power <br />in the Phase II re ort. lines. <br />Item 1(6) (include) The shear strength, cohesion, and angle of friction of the materials in the failure <br />surface/zone. <br />Initial impressions to be provided A good presentation of initial <br />in the Phase I report. An update impressions is provided. <br />to be provided in the Phase II <br />re ort. <br />Item l 7 include) The amount and wei ht of materials that contributed to the drivin forces of the slide. <br />Current impressions are to be <br />provided in the Phase II report. <br />A statement is made that "--we do <br />not know whether it will be <br />possible to determine to a <br />reasonable degree of certainty <br />whether this mass or volume <br />contributed to the driving forces <br />of the landslide." What other <br />drivin arces are there? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.