GENERAL51106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Mined Land Reclamation Act ("MLRA") sets forth that: Any person aggrieved by any final action of the office may file an appeal of such action with the boazd. Such appeals shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of article 4 of title 24, C.R.S. C.R.S. § 34-32-107(2). The Colorado Administrative Procedures Act ("CAPA") sets forth a broad standard for participation in these agency proceedings: A person who may be affected or aggrieved by agency action shall be admitted as a party to the proceeding upon his filing with the agency a written request therefor, setting forth a brief and plain statement of the facts which entitle him to be admitted and the matters which he claims should be decided. [...] C.R.S. § 24-4-105(2)(c). Colorado courts recognize that any person who has been "affected or aggrieved" and has filed a written request is entitled to participate in a MLRB proceeding. New Jersev Zinc Co., Div. of Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Bd., 738 P.2d 51, 54 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987)("Any person who maybe affected or aggrieved by agency action must be admitted as a party upon its request, or it may be admitted as a party for any limited purpose.") Thus, Intervenors meet both prongs -Intervenors "maybe affected or aggrieved" by the agency action and have submitted a "written request" -- and are entitled to participate as full parties. The inquiry into intervention need go no further and may be granted on the basis that a written request has been submitted and the potential reversal of the DMO findings would affect or aggrieve Intervenors' interest in the lawful application of the MLRA to these mines. Granting the present intervention request is mandated by the broad participation requirements of the CAPA as incorporated into the MLRA and is consistent with the intent and purpose of Rules themselves. The 1994 Statement of Basis and Purpose for the MLRB Rules state that the Rule 7.2.1(4) allows "any person that does not agree with the Office's determination (of DMO status) to appeal the decision to the Board." Statement of Basis Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose, April 13, 1994 at 32. Further, Hazd Rock/Metal Mining (HRMM) Rule 7.2.2, and other rules regarding DMO designation "are intended to give all persons proper notice and due process ..." Id. The MLRB rules must be interpreted consistent with the broad "affected or aggrieved" standazds in the CAPA and cannot be narrowed by interpreting the rules to create vague restrictions or unfettered discretion to deny an intervention request. New Jersey Zinc Co., Div. of Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Bd., 738 P.2d 51, 54 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). In other words, the Rules cannot be interpreted or applied to frustrate or defeat the principle of broad participation in agency decisionmaking.