My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51080
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:31:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
MINE PLAN RECOMMENDATION PACKAGE
From
OSM & BLM
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternative C: Modification of the Proposed Action <br />BLM's preferred alternative is to offer for lease 1,670,000 tons of <br />underground in-place coal reserves lying in the upper seam of the <br />Menefee formation on a 180-acre tract in La Plata County, Colorado. <br />(i) Selecting this alternative would be consistent with the t•lineral <br />Leasing Act of 1920, Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of <br />1976, and 43 CFR 3400. <br />(ii) This alternative would allow an existing underground mine <br />operation to maintain its annual level of production, for a <br />period of time not to exceed eight years of recoverable reserves <br />at the rate of production under which the applicant qualifies. <br />Alternative D: No Action <br />vo not hold a lease sale in response to emergency lease application <br />C-2912d. <br /> <br />(i) Selecting this alternative would not be consistent with the <br />Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Federal i:val Lrasir~g :,.:an,l:rer~fs <br />Act of 1976, and 43 CFR 3400. <br />(ii) If a lease sale was not held, the existing mining operation <br />would become inactive. This would result in unemployment for <br />70 people, loss of tax revenues to federal, state, and local <br />governments. <br />E:. Based on the EA, this proposal is neither an action significantly <br />affecting the human environment nor is the action highly controver- <br />sial. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact State- <br />ment is not required. <br />C. Other Factors Considered in the Decision <br />The unsuitability criteria as required by 43 CFR 3461 were applied, <br />and the proposed lease area was considered acceptable for further <br />mining subject to mitigating measures. <br />D. Litigating Measures <br />The leasing of the coal would be subject to the standard leasing <br />stipulations and special stipulation listed below. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.