My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50428
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:36:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/12/1984
Doc Name
INITIAL REVIEW COMMENTS
From
OSM
To
DNR
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because the situation at each mine will be unique to that mine, possible <br />1 streamflow depletion from induced al]uvial aquifer inflows will nave to be <br />estimated on a case-by-case basis, However, it is suggested that, in most <br />instances, any such inflows will probably be recycled to surface flows. It <br />is recommended, therefore, that unless such inflows are consumptively used <br />in the mine operation and not returned to surface flows, they should be <br />eliminates from consideration as streamflow depletions. <br />Deep aquifer inflows <br />For consideration of streamflow effects, deep aquifers are those that are <br />hydraulically isolated fran surficial aquifers, at least insofar as <br />relatively snort-term effects are concerned, and whose recharge areas are <br />relatively remote from the mine. Because inflows from such aqui fern are <br />isolated from mine-area surface flows, any such inflows that are not <br />consumptively used and that are pumped out of the mine and into stream <br />channels can be considered augmentations to streamflow. Such streamflow <br />augmentations are fairly common for underground mines. Estimates for the <br />Eagle No. 9 mine (Coloraao) indicate streamflow augmentation of about 1,550 <br />acre-feet/year for 20 years of mining activity. The Cottonwood Creek Basin <br />(Utah) CHIA report estimates streamflow augmentation of about 2,900 acre- <br />feet/year during mining. <br />It is recommended that any such augmentations to streamflow derived from <br />deep aquifer mine inflows be factored into the equation when overall mining <br />effects on annual surface floes are estimated. <br />Postmininq inflow to workings <br />This is inflow to mine workings following shutdown df mining. Defending on <br />wnether inflows are induced from surficial aquifers or are from deep <br />aquifers, a depletion from streamflow may occur following mining. <br />Estimates for the Eagle Plo. 9 mine are for inflows of 56 acre-feet/year for <br />3 years, derived from the alluvial aquifer. The Cottonwood Creek Cy [A <br />report estimates an almost identical 55 acre-feet/year depletion from <br />streamflow but is unclear as to the duration of the depletion. <br />Considering that pumped mine outflows originating from deep aquifers and <br />postmining inflows do not occur concurrently, it may not be possible to <br />include these items in a single equation far estimating overall effects on <br />endangered fisn. More definition of streamflow depletion effects on <br />endangered species is needed from Fisn and Wildlife Service in this <br />respect. <br />Coal ttoisture Loss <br />Tnis is loss of water adhering to coal as it is brougnt to the surface. An <br />estimation of such losses at the Eagle No. 9 mine is 0.5 acre feet/year. <br />Considering that this represents the loss for a Aroduction of 1.5 million <br />tons/year, it is recommended that such effects, being generally <br />insignificant, be eliminated from consideration as stresinflow eepletions. <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.