Laserfiche WebLink
Tne effects of subsidence on spring and seep flows are almost impossible to <br />predict. Two recent Utah CH IA reports (Cottonwood Creek Basin and Mud <br />~~ Creek Basin) provide qualitative discussions which identify potentially <br />affected spring and seep flows. However, quantifying such effects depends <br />on ongoing monitoring as mining progresses. Because of the difficulty in <br />predicting effects, it is recommended that subsidence effects on spring and <br />seep flows be eliminated from consideration in estimating streamflow <br />depletions. <br />Alluvial well supplies <br />Alluvial wells may supply water to both surface facilities and underground <br />operations--or to coal processing plants. In most instances, pumpage from <br />such wells can be considered as depletions from streamflow. Two conditions <br />may exist within valley fill alluvial aquifers: Alluvial ground .voter may <br />either discharge to, and augment, streamflow; or streamflow may infiltrate <br />to, and augment, alluvial ground water. However, in born instances, <br />al'uvial well pumpages can be considered as streamflow depletion. In the <br />first instance, pumpage intercepts water that would otherwise eventually <br />augment streamflow. In the second instance, pumpage induces an equivalent <br />abstraction from streamflow as a result of increased gradients, and Hence <br />flow rates, away from the stream channel. <br />Except in the unlikely instance that alluvial wells are hydraulically <br />isolated from stream cnannels, it is recommended toot alluvial well pumpage <br />be considered as a depletion from streamflow. <br />Alluvial aquifer abstractions into mines <br />Such abstractions usually occur where mine-affected aquifers subcrop <br />beneath valley-fill alluvial aquifers. Ground-water movement between the <br />bedrock and alluvial aquifers may be in either direction, and mining may <br />still affect streamflow either by inducing a reversal of water table <br />gradients that normally are away from mining or interception of ground <br />water that would eventually de tributary to streamflow. <br />Quantifying streamflow depletions from such effects is not nearly so <br />straightforward as for alluvial well pumpage, as discussed above. Effects <br />on streamflow are indirect, may be short term or long term or both, and are <br />difficult to define because of the multiple aquifers affected. Defining an <br />effect on streamflow is furtner complicated by considering toot such <br />mine-induced inflows will normally be pumped out of the mine and -eturned, <br />after treatment, to surface flows. Mine discharges returned to surface <br />f]ows are essentially immediate inflows, whereas induced abstractions from <br />streamflow via aquifer depletions may be very long term. <br />An example of such induced a]luvial aquifer inflow is provided by the Eagle <br />Plo. 9 mine in Colorado. Estimated alluvial aquifer inflow via bedrock <br />subcrops is 35 gallons per minute. However, this inflow, together with <br />deep aquifer inflow, is pumped out of the mine and returned to surface <br />flows ditty no resulting depletion. Mining nos been underway for a <br />sufficient period of time toot inflow has stabilized at the 35 gallons <br />per minute rate. <br />J 1 <br />-f} <br />