My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50428
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:36:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/12/1984
Doc Name
INITIAL REVIEW COMMENTS
From
OSM
To
DNR
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d. C\:I has no[ provided an environmental analysis assessing <br />transportation system alternatives, as required by stiputa[ion <br />(p) of [he_Federal lease. This plan must be submitted and BL`1's <br />preferred alternative must be incorporated into the proposed <br />modification. <br />e. dap No. 2-5 indicates a proposed ventilation shaft to be <br />located within [he Eas[ Roatcap Creek buffer area. This propose~t <br />shaft is not discussed in the text. Location of a ventilation <br />shaft in this buffer zone :rust be justified with respect to <br />Federal lease stipulations (~) and (n) and possibly or.hers. <br />f. The water-rights inventory required by Federal lease <br />stipulation (i) w.es [n include water rights in specified <br />drainages all the way Co [hair confluence :•~ith the North Fork of <br />the f:unnison River. According to the water-rights maps, the <br />inventory did not go to the North Fork on some drainages. The <br />inventory area should be expanded to include all arras required <br />in stipulation (i). <br />g. ThN water replacement plan submitted in response [n Federal <br />lease stipulations (d) and (e) does no[ compare flows for CWI <br />held mater rights with those of potentially affected water right <br />ho1<lers. Flows for CIJI held water rights should be included in <br />the plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.