GENERAL50229 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) reviewed the Resource Recovery and Protection Plan for compliance with the Minera] Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, and 43 CFR Part 3480. The BLM recommended approval of the mining plan in a memorandum dated June 5, 2006. In this same memorandum the Bureau of Land Management concurred with the proposed mining plan with respect to Federally owned surface lands under its management within the proposed mining plan area. In accordance with the September 24, 1996, Biological Opinion and Conference Report from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) to OSM, OSM sought comments from the USF&WS on threatened and endangered species. In a Biological Opinion dated March 3, 2006, the USF&WS concurred with OSM's Biological Assessment and that species-specific protective measures did not need to be developed for this new mining plan. The State Historic Preservation Officer concurred with the proposed mining plan in a letter dated November 1, 2005. I have determined that the new mining plan does not include any lands within an area designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations under section 522(b) of SMCRA. The permit findings prepared by the regulatory authority demonstrate that reclamation as required by the Act and regulatory program is technologically and economically feasible. The new mining plan area is not on any Federal lands within the boundaries of any national forest. I have determined that approval of this new mining plan will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. The environmental analysis prepared by the Bureau of Land Management entitled, Environmental Assessment, EA Number CO-SJFO- 00-102EA, National King Coal, LLC, Coal Lease Application, East Alkali Tract, COC- 62920, and noted in the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), describes the impacts that may result from approval of this new mining plan and its alternatives. The FONSI and supporting environmental analyses are included in this decision document. OSM's review of the proposed action did not identify any issues that required resolution via the addition of special conditions to the new mining plan approval. Publication of four consecutive weekly newspaper notices in the Durango Herald notified the public of the availability of the administratively complete PAP for review. The last publication date was November 25, 2005. The CO-DMG determined that a bond for $130,000.00 is adequate for the Colorado Permit C-81-035 associated with this mining plan. The bond is payable to the State and • the United States.