Laserfiche WebLink
Pond Outfall Pond Outfall <br />Number Notes Number Notes <br />001 Old Refuse Pile, East <br /> U er <br /> Middle <br /> Lower <br />006 Old Refuse Pile, To <br />008 Bus Gaza e <br /> East <br /> West <br /> North <br />010 Warehouse <br /> U er <br /> Lower <br />013 Mine 4 <br />Ol7 Mine 5 I <br />018 Mine 1 <br /> U er <br /> Lower <br />021 Sute Refuse Pile <br /> U er <br /> Lower <br />022 Mine 2 <br /> U er <br /> Lower <br />023 Mine 3 Bin Pad <br />024 SI Pond <br />025 Rock Tunnel Pad <br />The Best Management Practices employed included severe surface roughening of excavated pond <br />embankments and access roads in order to disrupt surface flows and to minimize erosion <br />potential, construction at a point in time where water levels were low so as to not impact water <br />quality with sediment, revegetation of all disturbed areas with appropriate wetlands and uplands <br />azea seed mixtures in order to promote long term stability of the sites, planting of shrubs along the <br />pond perimeters in order to establish a vegetative sediment barrier, and placement of silt fence <br />below excavation areas in order to retain sediment prior to it entering adjacent water resources. <br />No dewatering of any pond was required, as most ponds were devoid of water at the time of <br />construction. Water, when present, was well below the elevation of the invert of the dewatering <br />devices, and therefore, well below the elevation of the construction area. <br />Reclamation construction at each of the ponds was accomplished in the same manner. <br />Construction began by excavating the corrugated metal pipe (CMP) dewatering device located <br />within each pond. The excavation was widened to five feet minimum width. Excavated dirt was <br />generally used as a topsoil substitute at the top of the pond embankment, along a small portion of <br />the pond margin, or on associated access roads. The CMP was removed to a central area for <br />storage prior to removal from the site. During removal of the CMP, the side slopes of each cut <br />were reduced to 2.5 H : 1 V. They were then severely roughened in order to minimize erosion <br />potential and to promote successful revegetation. Following completion of excavation, two <br />courses of rip rap were placed within the cut. The first was mechanically pushed into the <br />excavated embankment at the base and into the lower portion of the side cuts. The second course <br />was placed over the first. Access roads, where existent, were reclaimed by sloping them toward <br />the outside margin of the road, and then severely roughening them. A wetlands seed mixture was <br />distributed around the perimeter of each pond from the water level to an elevation ten feet above <br />the water ]evel. An upland, high altitude reclamation seed mixture was distributed on any <br />.. <br />