My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49886
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:41 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:30:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 5 6 & 7
From
STEIGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CNAPTERFIVE CumulaWe ~muacts <br />Introduction <br />Compliance with NEPA requires analysis of the cumulative impacts of each alternative. <br />' Cumulative impacts aze those resulting from the incremental impact of an altemative when added <br />to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regazdless of who has taken <br />those actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant <br />actions taking place over a period of time. A cumulative impact scenario has been developed <br />that identifies those past, present, and future actions that may contribute to a significant <br />cumulative effect when combined with the effects of other alternatives. <br />Projects Evaluated <br />Four projects aze included in the analysis of cumulative impacts: White River Nahcolite, <br />TransColorado Pipeline, Colorado Interstate Gas Pipeline, and Colorado Oil and Gas Leasing <br />and Development. These projects were determined to be the most likely to contribute to <br />cumulative impacts, and a description of project components and activities for these projects is <br />provided in the following sections. <br />White River Nahcolite <br />The White River Nahcolite Minerals holds four federal sodium leases (8,222 acres). The project <br />is a commercial-scale nahcolite solution mine. The 30-yeaz project began in 1991 and is <br />currently producing sodium bicazbonate at a rate of approximately 80,000 tons per year. The <br />White River Nahcolite project is located about one mile southwest of the western boundary of <br />the proposed Yankee Gulch Project Piceance Site (Figure 5-1). The White River Nahcolite <br />project is described in the 1986 EIS (BLM 1986). The following information was revised from <br />projections in that 1986 EIS to reflect current production levels (Daggett 1998). <br />Key project components/activities include: <br />• Approximately 215 acres of disturbance associated with well-field development. Less than 1 <br />cavity is being mined annually, involving the drilling of less than 2 production wells each <br />yeaz. Over the 30-yeaz life of the mine, 30 cavities would be mined, involving 60 production <br />1 wells. <br />• Three evaporation ponds with a total of ] 0 acres of evaporation surface. <br />' • Approximately 65 gpm (95 acre-feet per yeaz) of water is required for mine operation and <br />process facilities. <br />• Employment of 21 full-time employees who live in Rifle, Pazachute and Meeker azeas. <br />• Traffic from operations included 12 trucks per day/25 tons per truck/5 days per week. <br />The total acreage of disturbance over the life of the mine would be up to 257 acres. At <br />completion of the project, surface facilities will be removed or buried onsite and disturbed azeas <br />reclaimed for use as range or wildlife habitat. <br />5-l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.