Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Gold Hill Mill Afligpscv r1.v;.+ nnnoenag Mwv 2 1995 <br />I3 The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHAI inspector indicated verbally after the inspection that <br />everything was sflbsfactory et the srk and did no[ issue any citations. The repon was sent to CMLRB and <br />not to the Gold Hill rrtill or COM, lac. A copy of the repon was rcqutsted @om the Divuwn a@er the <br />shortoorrtirtge ware mentioned by the Divteton inspectors <br />The shortcomings are bsted hdow with our responses: <br />al 'Diversion ditches shove the tadmgs upoundment arc not very well maintauted end should <br />be upgraded.' <br />The diversion ditches have been clraned and deeprned to safety pass a design sWrm. <br />h) "Decant pipes not capable of safely passing the quanhry of water during a design storm." <br />The water ponding Donlon oC the tatlvtgs pond weer supposedly designed to conlairt a desiptt <br />storm end the decant Imes were tnetelled to remove the deergn storm water ova a period of <br />several days. <br />e) "Recommended that the crest of the embanlmtcnt should be widened and the outslape <br />Oattened.' <br />The embanlonertt crest and dam outalope were approved by CMLRB and the etarta dam was <br />built in accordance with spenfuahons. CUM, Ina. u currently reviewing the specifications but <br />cannot give an opinion tin the stability until a complete evelueoon w made. The pond appears <br />to be stable vt its cunettt configuration end the dam crest sppears [o be wide enough <br />17, The Gold Hill Mill does not see a compelling rmson to Cence the entire mill complex There is cunatdy a <br />fence around the tarhnga unpoundmmt and ilris frnce will be maintained and upgraded during the life of the <br />operation until the tailings era is reclemred. <br />18. The tailings dam, as prcxnlty configured, is the original starter dam without any raises. The sterna dent was <br />not built by the upstream method. <br />19. The starter dun (drke) was built tiom material that was tekrn from the retention pond arcs upstream t}om <br />the dam Drawutgs recrndy obtained by the Division (April 2a, 1995) from Mark Steen show dre <br />confrguration of the starter dam and borrow azea. The "as•buill" drawings show a dam treat that is 10 to I?- <br />feet ut width with a downstream slope of approximately I.3: i Height of the embenhnent is hard to <br />determine beceuu the drawings end seedona do not show original Bound or contotas, however, rough <br />meastuemenb on the section indicate en emhenlmrent that is 4 to 8 feet in height at crnteriirre, <br />10. The original plans frn ilx tailings impoundment inchrded s eapage eolleclion system that would pipe the <br />seepage to the Haul A edit lust prior to constrttcborL the Divisors requeskd that a synthetic bner be <br />instelltd. 'ihe lira does not allow any seepage 4vough the dun and, the[efore, no seepage collection weer <br />rnstalled. Decant lines nurently collect excess water fiom storm runoff +nthin the tailings rttrntion pond <br />arts and diced them through a pipeline to the Hazel A edit. Decant wakr is then recycled from the Hsu] A <br />back to the mill <br />?l. COM, Inc. plans to rue soda ash, pine od, and xanthek for mill processing. If any other chemicals are <br />requred N the millitrg process, a technical revision, if required by the D.M.G., will be filed with the <br />Division. The chemicals are eurrendy bour,~rt to buck and the following maximum ~ruurnties will t+e stored <br />9I the mill: <br />Soda Ash 30,000 pounds <br />Pine Od 2,000 ganoru <br />)Wrthak 2,000 galloru <br />