My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49680
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:19:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/16/2003
Doc Name
Human Health Evaluation of Cement Kiln Emissions
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />The CEMEX portland cement plant in Lyons, CO is considering the use of scrap tires as a <br />future supplemental fuel source. To confirm the potential impact on human health from tire- <br />derived fuel {TDF) compared to fossil fuels alone {FF), the Lyons plant conducted a source <br />emissions test from November 13-22, 2002. The test was conducted under normal operating <br />conditions and measured a wide range of metals, inorganic, and organic chemicals. <br />^ CEMEX tested for a suite of elements and compounds far more extensive than required <br />under current regulations. <br />• Emissions were measured during both conditions: FF only, and FF combined with 19% <br />TDF. <br />• The results of the source emission tests indicate that overall emissions are low when <br />either FF or TDF is used and well within all applicable permit and regulatory <br />requirements. <br />^ Emission levels and related health risks are similar in the Lyons Plant test to those <br />conducted at other facilities. <br />• The Lyons Plant results indicate that the risk to human health from the use of FF or TDF <br />is extremely low and below regulatory concern levels. <br />The specific types and amounts of chemical emissions measured at the Lyons plant for both <br />FF and TDF were generally similar to emission profiles from previous stack tests at other <br />cement kilns around the country. However, there were also several differences in the Lyons <br />Plant source emission worth noting. At cement kilns that have conducted comprehensive stack <br />emission tests and human health risk assessments, the risk driver chemicals were either <br />formaldehyde, benzene, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins/furans, carcinogenic <br />polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), or a combination of these chemicals. Although some <br />of these chemicals were detected during the Lyons Plant emissions tests, the emission 'rates <br />tended to be lower than for other facilities. Furthermore, PCBs were not detected for either FF <br />or TDF, and dioxin/furans, expressed as TCDD equivalents, were not detected during the TDF <br />test. Conversely, the emission rate for chromium was higher for both FF and TDF at the Lyons <br />Plant than at other facilities, although it was still low from a human health perspectivet <br />The emission rates for these chemicals are of particular interest in terms of human health <br />because collectively they have been shown to be responsible for 83-98% of the potential <br />human health risks from cement kiln emissions. <br />The differences in emission rates between FF and TDF were relatively modest, particularly in <br />terms of the risk driver chemicals discussed above. Formaldehyde emission rates for TDF <br />were twice the rates for FF and chromium was about 50% higher for TDF compared to FF. <br />Dioxin/furan (TCDD equivalents) were barely detected during the FF test and not detected in <br />the TDF test. Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs expressed as <br />benzo(a)pyrene equivalents) were detected at extremely low concentrations in both the FF and <br />TDF tests. Benzene emission rates were higher for TDF than FF but still on the low end of the <br />range for most cement kilns. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.