My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49680
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:19:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/16/2003
Doc Name
Human Health Evaluation of Cement Kiln Emissions
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2 NESHAP Requirements <br />National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP)3 are established by EPA <br />under the Clean Air Act (1990) and are based on the best available engineering and control <br />practices for a given industrial source. This level of control is also referred to as Maximum <br />Achievable Control Technology or MACT. <br />The results from both the FF and TDF emission tests were well below applicable NESHAP <br />requirements for PM and dioxins and furans, as shown in Table 3. When calculated in terms of <br />pounds/ton of raw feed, PM emission rates were nearly identical (FF- 0.09; TDF - 0.10) for the <br />two fuel tests. On a TEO basis, dioxins and furan emission rate was 0.02 ng/m3 for the FF <br />test, which is approximately 10 times lower than the NESHAP requirement of 0.2 ng/m3. For <br />the TDF emissions test, TCDD TEQ measurements were below the detection limit, which for <br />the TDF runs was <0.02 ng/m3. <br />2.3 Unregulated Air Pollutants <br />Relative differences in emission levels between the two tests varied by chemical class and by <br />chemical but were very low in both cases. <br />2.3.1 Metals <br />The emission rates for metals are summarized in Table 4. Most metal emission rates <br />increased with TDF; the increases ranged from 8-165%. Only Co (-74%)and Ag (-25%) <br />decreased with TDF. Although the percentage differences in metal emission rates may appear <br />rather large in some cases, it is important to note that the actual emission rates involved are <br />extremely small. This means that the actual difference in mass of material emitted over a <br />year's time is only a few pounds per year. For example, the maximum increase in annual mass <br />for any one metal was a little less than 18 pounds (zinc) and the total annual increase for all <br />metals emitted by the use of TDF was less than 100 pounds. <br />Typically, metal emissions contribute a small proportion (2-20 %) of the overall potential health <br />risk based on risk assessments pertormed at other facilities; so, the magnitude of the increases <br />observed with TDF are of no public health concern. <br />2.3.2 Hydrogen Halides <br />Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) was the only hydrogen halide measured in these tests. The emission <br />rate for HCI was approximately the same (0.6 Ib/hr) for both FF and TDF fuels. (Table 5). <br />2.3.3 Aldehydes/Ketones <br />Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are commonly measured in cement kiln emissions. TDF <br />emissions were higher than FF emissions by a factor of 2 for formaldehyde and nearly a factor <br />of 4 for acetaldehyde (Table 5). However, the very small emission rates for these two <br />aldehydes during the FF test exaggerate these differences. The formaldehyde emission rates <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.